Transcript
Use with ChatGPT / Claude Auto-scroll A
The speaker opens with Meghan's Emmy nomination and explains why the show was nominated rather than Meghan individually. The discussion then shifts to her As Ever business and the timing of its promotion amid family controversy.
Speaker A
Foreign.
Good morning and welcome back, you guys.This is video number two, and believe it or not, it's all Harry Megan stuff.We have a lot of different stories in here, but for me, the biggest story is Megan.Megan has now changed her story and she's claiming it's not that she was silent, she was silenced.Yes, we've heard that before.
So let's just jump in and get busy, shall we?Let's go.We're going to start with Megan and the Emmys.Remember, back in July, Megan was celebrating the news that her Netflix lifestyle series, With Love, Megan had gotten an Emmy nomination.And she went to Instagram to congratulate the crew, producers and everyone involved, announcing they've been nominated for outstanding lifestyle series.
And naturally, the headlines started rolling in about Megan getting an Emmy.But it wasn't Megan getting the individual acting or presenting nomination.It was the television program being nominated at the Daytime Emmys.And the program got considers because they have a submission process.Eligible programs are entered for consideration.An entry fee is paid, and the submissions are evaluated by industry judging panels.It went through the standard award submission and judging process.It does appear it was nominated by Netflix.Being submitted for an award.Being nominated for an award, though, and actually winning the award are three different things.
So the program was competing against four other shows, A Different Breed, George to the Rescue, the Motherhood, and the wizard of Paws.And when the 53rd annual Daytime Emmy Awards took place at the Hollywood Palladium in Los Angeles, With Love, Megan did not win the Emmy for outstanding lifestyle program, went to A Different Breed, and Megan wasn't even there.So congratulations to the people behind A Different Breed.With that, let's move on to Megan's next business venture.
This chapter covers reports that Meghan may launch a yoga and wellness business in Britain, along with reactions to the idea. It then moves into polling on Harry and Meghan's favorability in the UK and broader public attitudes toward the monarchy.
Speaker A
Because while one television project has come to an end, as ever is heading in some new directions, Megan continues to promote her business and expand its activities.
Even while these disturbing allegations involving her father dominate the headlines.Now, Megan is entitled to continue operating her business.Companies don't just stop functioning because a relative is involved in a controversy.But the timing has certainly attracted attention as well as her prices.$398 for a tablecloth, $98 for a teapot, $130 for some rattan chargers, $185 for a blank leather notebook, and $98 for a candle.
On October 30, Page Six reported on Megan's message in her 2026 holiday catalog, where she discusses the things that bring her joy.She mentioned spending time with her kids, gardening, travel, and building her business.And she thanked Customers for supporting as ever.Now, some people will see it as Megan carrying on with her responsibilities, but others are considering the timing and they think it's uncomfortable.And of course, the Sussexes have never exactly struggled to attach publicity.
And now, apparently, Megan has another business idea.Yoga.Yes, yoga.According to reports, Megan is considering launching a yoga and wellness business in Britain.Apparently, she thinks there's room in the British market for a wellness venture carrying her personal branding.
Now, yoga isn't something Megan has suddenly discovered.Her mom, Doria, has worked as a yoga instructor and Megan has talked about practicing yoga since she was young.However, according to a source, Megan believes she could create something premium and accessible.Well, I guess that would depend on the price, won't it?The source said the business might involve online content, events, products or collaborations, or rather than opening an actual yoga studio.
The report also claims Meghan sees Britain differently now that she and Harry have returned to live there.And she thinks the British wellness market offers new commercial opportunities.So after everything Harry and Meghan have said about their experiences in Britain, apparently the country is looking considerably more attractive when there's a potential business opportunity involved.The Daily Express actually asked its readers whether Meghan could establish or should establish a yoga business in Britain.And the reaction was hardly enthusiastic.And this is where Megan might face a challenge.There's plenty of experienced yoga instructors, established studios, wellness retreats and and online fitness businesses in Britain.So what exactly would Megan be offering that isn't already available?Maybe the problem is her popularity.Speaking about whether the British public is embracing Megan's latest venture, we've got some interesting new polling numbers.
On October 29, YouGov released its Royal Family Favorability Survey based on interview with over 2000 British adults.It was conducted on October 22nd and 23rd and the results are not flattering.Harry has only 29% of British adults have a positive opinion of him.That's down 4 percentage points since July.So 60% have a negative opinion of Harry.
And remember, this is a man who was once the most popular member of the British royal family.Megan has only 20% of respondents with a positive opinion.Of her, 68% have a negative opinion.And that gives Megan a favorability rating of -48.That is the lowest net rating Megan has recorded in the Royal Family Tracker.
Not exactly the triumphant public, you know, return we've been hearing so much about.But what's interesting is the polling comes after Harry and Meghan returned to Britain in August with appearances and pictures and publicity and reports, reports about their reception.But apparently all that attention has not translated into a surge in popularity.And when you compare those numbers with William and Catherine, they remain at the top of the royal popularity rankings, with 72 to 74% of the British adults viewing them positively.Princess Anne is not far behind with 68%.
Even King Charles, whose popularity has declined, still has a positive rating of 58%.And here's another interesting number.64% of those surveyed still want Britain to remain a monarchy.So despite everything we've heard over the years about the monarchy being outdated, a clear majority still support keeping it.
The speaker examines the Metropolitan Police's handling of a letter involving allegations about Thomas Markle Sr. and why the matter is under scrutiny. The chapter also discusses Meghan's public messaging, Harry's Diana documentary involvement, and claims that Harry wants better access to royal schedules and property.
Speaker A
Now we're going to move on to the next story, which raises some really serious questions.The Metropolitan Police referred themselves to Britain's police watchdog over their handling of the allegations concerning Thomas Marle Sr.The Met Police issued an official statement explaining what happened on October 29.The head commander, who heads the Met Protection Command, confirmed the force received a letter January of 2019.And the letter had been written by Rosalind Loveless, Thomas Markle's former wife.It was addressed to the Mets Protection Command, specifically the Fixated Threat Assessment Center.Now, that center deals with concerns about threats to public figures.According to the police, the person writing the letter suggested she was concerned about Meghan Markle's security.But the police said the letter did not actually contain information specifically related to security.Instead, it had allegations about possible criminal conduct outside the UK So what did the Met Police do with that information?
Did they send it to the police in the countries where the alleged offenses might have, you know, occurred?
Did they alert the relevant overseas law enforcement agencies?No.According to their own statement, the letter was assessed and then passed to the office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for their awareness.And the allegations were not shared with other law enforcement agencies.So let me get this straight.
The police get a letter containing potentially serious allegations about conduct overseas.They decide the letter didn't have information relevant to Megan's security, so they didn't pass it on.But they did send the letter to Harry and Megan's office.So, yes, somebody needs to explain.And apparently the Met Police now agree that their handling of this matter needs independent scrutiny.
Now, on October 29, the Met announced it had voluntarily referred itself to the independent Office for Police conduct, known as IOPC.And then on October 30, the watchdog announced it would open an independent investigation.It's also considering the decision to send the letter to Harry Megan's office, although it is not investigating that aspect.Just a reminder, Thomas Markle Sr.Denies the allegations and he's not been convicted of anything.And the investigation into the police does not establish that the allegations against him are true.Let's talk really quickly about Megan's reported movements in and out of Britain.There have been headlines about the Sussexes time in the uk, their family arrangements and their subsequent departure.But the word escaping has been used rather freely in commentary.The family had a planned half term break and they went.
They did not escape.Meanwhile, Megan has continued issuing public messages.In her holiday catalog, she wrote about the joy she finds in everyday moments, including spending time with Archie and Lily.She also discusses traveling, gardening and her business.And this came while the allegations concerning her father were making international headlines.
She also put out messages about how her children bring her joy.So once again, Megan brings everything back to her.Her feelings, how she's doing nothing at all about any possible victims.I mean, in my opinion, she's tone deaf.This woman sees absolutely nothing wrong with bringing the attention back to her at all times, no matter what the heck is going on around her.
Wow.I wanted to touch on this article because Harry is, we know, is doing the documentary marking the 30th anniversary of Princess Diana's death.And according to reports, Diana's brother, Earl Spencer now has a role in the project.Who here is surprised?Because I'm not.
Now, there's another issue here.William and Harry have both spent years honoring their mother's memories, sometimes together and sometimes separately.But now with the brothers estrangement, another major documentary involving Diana is inevitably going to invite comparisons.You know, is this becoming another opportunity for the media to revisit the conflicts between her sons?Absolutely.
Speaking of Harry, apparently he has some ideas about how things should work between himself and the palace.According to a report discussed in the Express.Harry.Harry wants better advance notice of the royal family's official engagements so that his and Meghan's appearances don't clash with those of King Charles, Prince William and the other working royals.Now, a Sussex source reportedly told the Times that Harry doesn't deliberately try to steal the spotlight and that the advanced information would help avoid scheduling conflicts.
The explanation is that canceling Sussex engagements at the last minute would disappoint charities.Well, why should the Royal family have to organize its official calendar around these two who voluntarily stepped away from duties?King Charles is the monarch.Prince William is the heir to the throne.Their official engagements are not commercial publicity opportunities.
And Harry is no longer working Royal.He thinks the palace should send him a calendar invitation every time somebody schedules a ribbon cutting.Apparently, Charles has not agreed to any such arrangements.And apparently, the royal diary isn't the only thing Harry wants access to.There are claims now that he wants to secure a permanent residence on royal property that includes Windsor, Frogmore Cottage, other properties associated with the monarchy.
Now, Harry and Meghan got thrown out of Frogmore and their former royal residence is no longer available to them.And now we're hearing suggestions that Harry wants a home inside the royal estate for security for his family.Now, I wonder if his time at Ian Wace's property is running out and they don't have the funds to purchase a property.You know, you can't live on somebody else's property forever.And being the King's son doesn't automatically mean the King has to provide a grace and and favor property whenever Harry wants one.
The monarchy isn't a hotel where you check out, complain about the management, and then demand your old sweep back.
This section focuses on the Markle family, including reports about relatives speaking publicly and the Philippine investigation into electronic devices and storage-unit material. It raises questions about evidence handling, media access, and Thomas Markle Sr.'s medical situation.
Speaker A
Now let's go back to the Markle family.There's been some reports and commentary involving Megan's niece and their views of Thomas Marle.And here's the question I want answered.Where have these relatives been throughout the years of the very public family disagreements?
What do they know firsthand?What have they been told by other relatives?And why are they choosing to speak publicly now?And it's also important to distinguish between firsthand knowledge and family accounts passed down from one person to another.You guys know what I'm saying?
Now let's move on to the investigation.According to reports published on the 29th, police in the Philippines have finally obtained judicial authorization to examine the electronic devices belonging allegedly to Thomas Markle Sr.These devices reportedly include hard drives and other electronics.They were handed to authorities by Thomas Markle Jr. Thomas Jr. Claims he discovered suspected child abuse materials among the possessions at his father's former residence in Cebu.Now, this warrant allows investigators to search or examine specific material under legal authority.
The forensic examination is really important because the investigators need to determine what the devices contain, whether any illegal material exists, and who may have possessed, downloaded, or accessed it.And that brings us to another issue.Who had accesses to those devices before police received them?Were they moved, opened, or examined?What were the contents?Were they copied?What records exist documenting their condition when they were handed over?And these questions about evidence integrity, they're not accusations against a particular individual because with the digital evidence, the details are going to matter.Because Reports indicate Thomas Jr. Enlisted the help of an IT technician specifically to help try to get data from the hard drive after the initial discovery of a, you know, material on the abandoned mobile phone before he called the police.So he potentially might have made the evidence unusable in court because essentially he tampered with it.
Get it?Like, and why would you do something like that?If you truly thought your father had done something illegal, why would you bring an IT person over to tamper with the stuff?Why wouldn't you just hand it to the cops?Now, this is the part of the story that really gets me.The Daily Mail reported that its journalists gained access to a storage unit in Rosarito, Mexico, previously rented by Thomas Markle Sr.So according to the newspaper, he rented it in 2017 and stopped making payments in 2024.The Daily Mail said the unit contained approximately 20 boxes, books, magazines, pictures, videotapes and hard drives.They reported finding material they describe as child, certain kind of abuse imagery, along with other explicit items.Now, these just descriptions are the newspapers allegations and findings.They are not by themselves a forensic determination of criminal responsibility.No, I want to concentrate on how that unit was accessed and documented.
The Daily Mail said it's reported was granted access after the rental payment stopped.And that's important because being granted access by a storage facility is not the same as having a police search warrant.And the question is what authority the facility had to permit that access under Mexican law and rental agreement.But there's something else.Look at these pictures.I've been comparing the images and I have questions about the placement of some of the objects.It looks like they move things around and took multiple pictures.Things were moved between photographs.
Were the boxes opened?Also, were items repositioned, you know, to make them easier to picture, and if so, who moved them?And this raises questions about whether the original condition of the unit was preserved and documented.And that's going to matter because the newspaper subsequently contacted authorities about what it reported finding.If potential evidence was handled before police arrived, investigators need to understand what happened.Who entered the unit?Who touched it?Did they do an inventory?Were photos taken before anything was disturbed?Were there any materials removed or relocated?
These are matters that could affect how investigators evaluate the evidence.And then there's another question.If the unit had not been paid for since 2024, why were its contents still there in October of 2026?Most storage facilities normally dispose of abandoned belongings like.Like within 90 days.
Of course, storage laws vary and a facility may have reasons for maintaining the property.So rather than just assume something sinister, I'd like to know the actual rental history, the facility's procedures, and whether any legal dispute or other arrangements explain the delay, because two years is a really long time.Now.I'm going to repeat what according to Taz said, because I think she was spot on.You have two UK newspapers who have been given exclusives and direct access to this evidence before the local police and various child protection agencies.
Surely, given the nature of these allegations, anyone receiving information such as this should give it directly to the authorities.And of course, it didn't take long for the pictures to show up of the Mexican police descending on the rental unit.And a team of forensic computer experts, as well as crime scene investigators and officials from the Baja California State Attorney General's office then were seen rummaging through the 5 foot by 10 foot vault after midnight local time.A copy of the search warrant was obtained by the Daily Mail and it was revealed that police investigators were given the go ahead by a judge to search for evidence consisting of child, a certain kind of a child abuse and that kind of material.But I mean, the unit had already been gone through by the Daily Mail.
So what exactly did they think they were going to find?Now, we are all aware that Thomas Markle Sr. Has been receiving medical care in Florida following the amputation of his left leg.And on October 30, the Mail reported he had been moved between care facilities in Lakeland, Florida.The sun also published a headline suggesting he had been asked to leave the care home.But Samantha Markle publicly disputed that characterization.
In a social media statement, she said she had arranged for her father to move to a better facility for his safety and insisted he had not been thrown out.Now, of course, without confirmation from the facility or someone with direct knowledge of the transfer, we shouldn't pretend to know which explanation is correct.But here's something again worth remembering.Thomas Markle is 82 years old.He's got dementia.
He's recovering from a major amputation and facing allegations that he denied.Whatever anyone thinks about his relationship with Megan, his medical care should not become another spectacle.And a picture of an elderly man in a wheelchair does not establish guilt, innocence or a reason for his transfer.
The final chapter turns to Meghan's awareness of the allegations, commentary about her silence, and claims that she was advised not to speak publicly. It closes with discussion of unnamed sources, comparisons to earlier royal controversies, and the speaker's concluding questions for viewers.
Speaker A
And now, you guys, we're coming to the questions surrounding Megan herself because, according to reporting, Megan became aware of allegations against her father in 2019.Then there's the question.
Question of her estrangement from the family.The relationship deteriorated around the time of her wedding in May of 2018, following the controversy over staged paparazzi pictures.And for years, Harry and Meghan have publicly disclosed the breakdown of that relationship in connection with the press.And this is where it becomes just unbelievable.This is Patrick Christie and I want you to hear what he Said, listen to this.I
Speaker B
was sent something that evening just immediate after this story broke from someone incredibly close to Harry and Meghan.I won't say very, very close to them.And this is the statement.This vindicates her.
All those people, those commentators, speculating and not knowing or understanding why she didn't want to have anything to do with him.Her father should feel shame for the bile they piled on her.They turned her into the bad guy without knowing anything because she was always the bad guy.It was always her fault.She was the heartless daughter.
More lessons for the media.Okay, a couple of things on that.Nothing in there about the victims initially, but then there was a public statement later that did say that.Okay, how are we supposed to know?You can't go around your entire life assuming that the absolute worst about someone that to me, straight out, the traps appeared to indicate that the Markle camps from Harry and Meghan psychology was ha.
Have that press.We've been sitting on this bombshell the whole time.I find that a little bit strange to your point, about how they've been completely vocal about absolutely everything and then all of a sudden this comes out.Not because of a police investigation, but I can understand it if there's been an arrest.There hasn't been an arrest.No, it's just come out and then
Speaker C
there's not been an arrest.We've had some clapped out politician in the Philippines saying it's all horrendous.
Speaker A
He pointed one other thing out on the show as well.Listen to this.
Speaker B
I mean, my initial instinct obviously is that if these allegations are true, absolutely awful, shocking, and your thoughts are with all of the victims.That said, I do find it slightly perplexing that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry were absolutely content to pour an absolute tubload over the royal family, seemingly the whole time sitting there knowing that her family is an absolute hot mess.I mean, what a ridiculous family.You've got this disgruntled ex wife who supposedly penned a letter with revelations about what a dangerous, alleged child sex predator Thomas Markle Sr. Is.Then you've got Thomas Markle Jr. Who supposedly stumbled across all of this box of horrific material, then called a photographer and been pictured next to your dad's box of child porn, which, I mean, can you imagine the conversation with a photographer there?All right, Thomas Markle Jr. Just sit next to your dad's box of child porn, please.
All right.Yeah, absolutely.How much you pay me for this?What a ridiculous family that is.Can we
Speaker A
now let's talk about the FBI The Daily Mail reported that they became involved after being alerted to the material discovered in Mexico.And some people have asked, what's going on?What is the FBI doing investigating a storage unit in Mexico?They do not have ordinary police jurisdiction to independently conduct searches or seize property, but Mexican authorities can exercise law enforcement authority there, and they can have the FBI investigate potential violations of American federal law and cooperate with foreign authorities.So the FBI's involvement isn't automatically improper or ridiculous.And while all of this is happening, we have social media accounts making these claims about conspiracies, planted evidence, and deliberate attempts to destroy reputations.But until the evidence is properly examined and the relevant facts established.Established, nobody should be declaring anything.Remember, people, due process.
It was inevitable it was going to happen.Because for days, Megan has been facing questions about what she knew concerning the allegations against her father, when she knew it, and why she didn't speak publicly about them.This is a bad look, so wouldn't you know it, a new explanation has emerged.According to the latest reporting, Megan actually wanted to go public back in 2019, but a royal Protection officer told her not to.The officer reportedly told her, just leave it with us.
Well, isn't that convenient?Here's what I believe.I think the growing backlash over Megan's silence may be the reason that this explanation is now surfacing suddenly.The story isn't simply that Megan knew about the serious allegations and didn't speak publicly.We're being told she wanted to speak if somebody advised her not to.
And apparently that somebody was a Royal Protection officer whose identity hasn't been established.In fact, according to all the reporting, the Met Police are still trying to identify this officer.So once again, we're left with an unnamed person at the center of a very important explanation.And this reminded me of something else.Remember Megan's interview with Oprah where she described wanting to unalive herself while she was a working Royal and she sought help through the institution, and she was told that assistance couldn't be provided.
That was a really serious account.But the identity of the person who allegedly turned her away was never established.She couldn't remember.So now we're hearing another unnamed individual, this time somebody who advised her not to speak publicly about her allegations involving her father.And I have the same question.
Question, who was this person?And I also want to know why this particular explanation is only emerging publicly now when the controversy is attracting so much attention.Why now are we only hearing a version of events that wasn't previously made public?Because what nobody asked that particular question I think the public deserves more than that.On that note, I'm just going to leave this with you.What do you make of Harry's reported peace terms?What questions do you think investigators most urgently need to answer about the material discovered in Mexico and the Philippines?And what do you think of Megan now, basically claiming that she wanted to speak out, but she was silenced?You know what I want?Don't forget to hit the like and the subscribe button and the bell for all notifications.Then go down into the description box where you'll find the link to my Twitter, my getter, my rumble, my email, a link to my father's book, which remains up for sale on Amazon, a link to my Amazon wish list, as well as a physical address for those of you who have donated to my coffee fund.
Thank you so much.And as always, you guys have a great day.