Global Meet-Up #5 (Toronto): Canada's Corporate Re-Structuring

My name is Kathy. I am the host of this event. Thank you guys all so much for coming. This is, I think, the first meetup in Canada, which is awesome because we're, you know, I'm from Toronto. Professor Jen's from Toronto. It's really nice to be back. And also, before we begin, I just want to give a shout out to some people who helped me with this event. This is Tim. Tim hosts a podcast, which we were actually just on, talking about biotechnology and geopolitics, and Tim helped me find the venue and is recording this. And then I also want to give a shout out to my brother who helped just set up the whole event as well, and my friends, Gerard and his friends with setting up the whiteboard and some of the food and snacks that you guys have had. And another really kind person who I met today, but I forgot his name, and he helped set up the sandwiches. If that's you, feel free to wave. And that's him. Yes. Thank you. So thank you, everyone. Awesome. Well, without further ado, I'm going to give the stage to Professor Jiang, and we'll start with the lecture. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you, Kathy. Okay. Good evening, everyone. It's really exciting to be with you this evening. As Kathy mentioned, this is my first Canada stop in my end of the world tour, End of the world global tour. So thanks so much to Kathy for organizing this. It's really a lot of work to put these meetups together, and Kathy has done this twice already, once in New York, and this will be our second time in Toronto. The New York one was fantastic. I'm sure this Toronto one will be great as well. I will eventually try to steal Kathy from Peter Thiel. I know he's a billionaire, but at least I'm not the Antichrist, I hope. Okay. All right, so without further ado, we will do a lecture about an hour, and I know we're in Canada, so we will talk about the U.S. canada trade war and what will happen. Okay, so as you know, the U.S. canada Trade Talks have broken down and they are now refusing to negotiate with each other. And Trump is threatening to impose a lot of tariffs on Canada, basically prohibit Canada from exporting alcohol, steel, dairy products to the United States. To the United States. So that's the general theme of tonight's lecture. Where is Canada heading in next 10, 20 years? Okay, so to establish this talk, I'm going to ask three questions or three paradoxes that have been troubling me for the past five years. Because even though I've not been in Canada for the past five years. I've been observing just because I have family back here. Okay, so I have three questions that maybe you guys can help me answer or answer together tonight. The first question is, why are there so many immigrants? Okay, so just. Just as a warning, I'm gonna offend a lot of people tonight. I was in the United States. They're very rude down there, so I was probably infected with their rudeness. As some of you may know. I also on a couple of comedy podcasts, Kurt Metzger and Sam Hyde, and they're very offensive. And so if I'm being offensive tonight, it's their fault. It's not my fault. Okay? Maybe a couple more weeks and my Canadian niceness will return to me. Okay, but the first question we have is, why do we have millions of immigrants coming into this country these past five to 10 years? It's all very sudden. We right after Covid. And it's really causing a lot of friction within Canadian society. For example, it's almost impossible for a young person to afford a house at the same time the wages are being driven down. And you would think that because all the friction being caused by mass immigration, they would put a moratorium on immigration. Instead. Mark Carney visits India. He visited India, I think, last year, and he told the Indians, please send more. In fact, we'll give you scholarships to come here. So that's just weird. Okay. Immigration is causing a lot of friction in Canadian society, and you are encouraging more of it. So. So this is a paradox. Why? Why migration? The second thing is, I remember growing up in Canada in the 80s and 90s, Canadians were known for their niceness. Being polite, being nice, being very friendly. But I've been back in Toronto for about a day and a half, and I take the subway and I walk around in order to get a sense of the milieu of this place. And I. And I've been startled by a couple of incidents. For example, I got off a subway with my son, and I saw a very angry young man get an argument with an old man. The man was probably in his 70s. The young man gets very upset and violently pushes the young man, the old man, down and against the wall. And I think that in the 80s and 90s, that would never happen, because it takes a lot for a young person to violently attack an old man who is basically defenseless. The old man took some time to get up, and people were just walking past him, including myself. I didn't know what had happened. I didn't want to get involved. I walked past him. But I'm pretty sure in the 80s and 90s, there would have been people who went to help him get up or at least call the police. Okay? So that's one incident that I saw yesterday. Yesterday as well, I was walking on bloor around Koreatown and I saw a huge argument between two people just walking around. I feel a sense of aggressiveness in this country that didn't really exist before. For example, in the 80s and 90s, people would make sure to give each other space, right? To respect each other's space. Now, it seems as though there are certain individuals that are trying to provoke others by infringing on other people's space, okay? So there's a certain meanness to this country that didn't really exist before. So that's the second paradox, which is, how do you get nice people to become mean? What happened? Okay? And then the third paradox is, why is Mark Carney Prime Minister? And you're like, well, duh. Well, we voted for him, okay? But my question is, why did you vote for him? Because I. Again, I mean, I'm the furthest from a conspiracy theorist, as you know. But I will say that there are certain things about the general election between Mark Carney and Pierre Polavier which basically confused me. So, I mean, Justin Trudeau was not a smart guy, okay? He probably never had original thought in his. In his life. Someone was giving him these ideas, and it was probably not himself. It was probably Mark Carney, right? And I think it's pretty obvious that Mark Carney was a shadow leader of the Liberal Party. So if you're upset with, like, Justin Trudeau for the for 10 because he was in power for 10 years, he screwed things up. Why would you put his puppet master in charge? Okay? And then the general election between Pierre Polavar and Mark Carney was kind of strange because the Conservatives had a huge lead and Paul, whatever, for reason, decides to just implode, okay? He basically doesn't even try. There's one attack, there's one line of attack that he could have used which he did not use during the general election, which is, hey, Mark Carney, you're a carpetbagger. Okay? Yes, you're a Canadian, but you spent most of your adult life either in New York or London working for Goldman Sachs or the bank of England. Most of your assets are foreign. Your family is overseas. You're a carpetbagger. You're not a true Canadian. A very simple, easy and effective attack. And we know this because previously There was a man, Michael Ignatieff, who was a Canadian, but he was a Harvard professor. He came back become leader of the Liberal Party and he lost twice. Why? Because his opponent just said this guy's a carpet bagger. Yes, he's Canadian, but he spend his all adult life in the United States. He's come back in order to steal from us. Okay? So this attack is very effective. For whatever reason, the current service did not use it. Right? So we have these three paradoxes. Why is there so much immigration in Canada? How the Canadians turn from niceness to meanness. And the third is why the guys elect Mark Carney, okay? Why not elect change? Right? Okay. So the answer to all three questions is, and I know this is going to offend some of you, but Canada is not a real country. Canada is not a nation state. Canada is a corporation. Okay? That's my main argument to you today. A corporation. And this is what's leading to a lot of current trends. And once we understand this, then it will help us better understand future trends, okay? The point of my teaching is not to make judgments. The point of my teaching is to provide deep analysis so that you can come to your own conclusions. Right? So that's my argument to you today. The solution to these three part paradox is the fact that Canada is not a real nation state, a real country. It is just a corporation that is controlled by the state of London. All right, so first, what many of you will ask, well, what then is a nation state? Well, historically we've had three major examples of nation states, okay? And they're all different examples. The first is France, which basically gave us a concept of a nation state. Second is Germany. The third is United States. Okay? And these are all three different conceptions of the nation state. All right, let's start with France. Okay? So if you know your history, France has something called a social contract. And this was a theory developed by Jean Jacques Rousseau in his book called the Social Contract, which is, we're born free. Our freedom is our most precious gift from God. We choose to surrender our freedom in order to work in society, in order to create a society. But in return for our freedom, we must be given rights. And this creates the idea of the citizen. Okay? And even today, if you go to France, I'm not sure if any of you have lived in France, but they take this idea of citizenship very, very seriously, okay? And it's created a lot of conflict in, in France because there are many Muslims who want to wear the hijab. And the French is Like, no, we are a secular nation state with a social contract. We don't allow that. We're not religious, okay? So. But what made the social contract possible was not a piece of paper. It was through blood. Specifically the French Revolution, right? And then. And then Napoleonic wars. That's what established France as a nation state. The sacrifice of the people in return for eternal and inevitable rights guaranteed by the state, okay? That's the French model. A social contract brought about by a people's revolution, okay? And it's still in effect today. And as I said, the French are very proud of this achievement. Then you have Germany for Germany, it's iron and blood. It is the language, it is the heritage, the culture that makes you German. And this is interesting, and this idea proposed by Johann Fichte, who was considered the father of German nationalism. And at this time in history, and you guys don't really appreciate this, the Germans were not a united people. They didn't speak the same language. And so it was up to philosophers like Johann Fate to come up with a conception of Germanists, okay? It was really the Prussians through their conquest that create the modern nation state of Germany. And people like Hitler were will reinforce the German ethnic identity. And the idea of German nationalism is you are born into this culture, this land, this language, this blood makes you who you are. Therefore, you must sacrifice everything in order to make the nation state great. Okay? So this is a very different conception of nationalism, and it's Germany. The last example of the nation state is the United States of America, okay? US and the US have been called the Constitution. It is best to think of the Constitution as a game, okay? You come to the United States and as long as you have ambition, you can become rich. And that is guaranteed to you by the Constitution, Okay? So for the United States, what matters is ambition. We don't care who you are, we don't care where you come from. If you come here, you work hard, you're talented, you're ambitious, you will succeed, okay? And that's the idea behind American nationalism. As you can see, all three are very different, but they all work, okay? Why I say Canada is not a nation state is the Canadians us. We don't have any of this history, okay? So, for example, the French had a revolution. Canada never had a revolution. And you guys may not know this, but Canada is not even owned by the government. It's owned by the crown. 89%, okay? 89%. Volcanian land is owned by the Crown. You're like, wait a minute, who the hell is the crown, okay? It literally means the King of England, okay? Literally, the King of England owns 89% of all the land in Canada. Well, this is interesting. You. You go online, you ask ChatGPT, does the King of England own 89% of Canada? Because if he did, that would be a very strange thing. And chapter two Beauty says, yes, he does. But it's all just a fiction, guys, okay? It's all just a technicality. The real power is the government and the provincial, both the federal and the provincial governments, and they are empowered by the people, okay? So it's just a fiction that the king is in charge for historical and heritage reasons, but in reality, the people in Canada are in charge. So don't worry about this, guys. I'm telling you right now, that's bs, okay? The King of England is really in charge. And the example I use is World War II, okay? World War II, the Germans are kicking everyone's ass, and the British are forced to retreat from Europe in a very embarrassing and humiliating defeat, okay? And Winston Churchill gives a radio address before Parliament, before the English people, and he says. And it is one of the most famous speeches in the world. I've actually taught this speech, but he basically says, we will never surrender. We will fight on the beaches. Okay? I'm sure you've all heard the speech. It's a very short speech. It's a very powerful speech. But there's an ending that you guys don't remember, okay? I'm sure you guys don't remember the ending, but the ending goes like this. We will never surrender. And providence, God is on our side. But if, for whatever reason, we lose Britain, it's okay. Why? Because we'll just go to Canada and we'll fight from there, okay? Do you guys understand this? Okay? The Prime Minister of England, Winston Churchill, says, canada is our territory. If we lose Britain, it's okay. We'll just all move over to Canada and fight from Canada. So in the British imagination, Canada is just a resource colony of the British. And legally speaking, it is true, okay? The democracy here, the separation of powers, the sort of rights and freedom, it's all just an illusion to disguise the fact that Canada is a resource colony of Britain. And the reason why is Canada never. Canadians never had a revolution, okay? If you never had a revolution, then the people in charge are still in charge. It was the British who founded Canada through the Hudson's Bay Company, and they're still in charge, okay? So Canada is not a real nation state, okay? The Germans say nationalism is iron and blood. Well, first of all, Canada has two languages, which is confusing, but also Canadians have really fought a war of expansion, okay? So Canadians don't have mythology of say, France, Germany and the United States, okay? The mythology. The Americans have the American Revolution, George Washington crossing the Potomac, okay? The Germans have Bismarck, France has Napoleon. So there's no mythology to unite the country. There's no sense of destiny. And United States has ambition, right? What do Canadians, what are Canadians allergic to? What do Canadians really, really hate? Ambition. Right. Okay, so you could also make the argument that not only is Canada not nationalistic, okay, but it is fundamentally anti nationalistic. The Canada was designed in a way that ensure that nationalism could never ever arise in, in order for Britain to maintain control over Canada. All right? Okay, so Canada is not a nation state. So what, what, what does that mean? Well, for 50 years. Oh, sorry. For 70 years after World War II, this was actually beneficial for Canada because it allowed Canada to navigate the relationship, the very complex relationship between Britain and the United States, okay? So this is Britain far away and this is the US down south. This is Canada, okay? The, the nature of Canadian anti nationalism allow Canadians to basically live the easiest, happiest, best life of anyone in the world for the past 70 years, all right? The relationship with Britain allowed Canada to become what is often referred to as an offshore financial center. Okay? What is an offshore financial center? It just means money laundering, okay? That's all it means. Money laundering. You think that the World bank of Canada, bank of Montreal, bank of Nova Scotia, they make your money taking your deposits? No, they don't need, they don't do that, okay? They don't need your money. What they really do is they do money laundering, okay? They allow dirty money that was won for the drug trade and wars and arms smuggling, all that to be recycled back into Canada, okay? That's, that's your real function. So Britain allowed Canada to be an offshore financial center as well as a land of immigration, Okay? And immigrants bring energy, wealth and ideas to Canada. The relationship with the United States was also really good because the United States was a growing manufacturing power. And so Canada provided resources to the United States, all right? Resources. So as you can see, for the past 70 years, Canada did really well because it. There were three main sources for gaining wealth. They were selling resources to the United States and Canada has an infinite amount of resources become an offshore financial center for Britain, for the state of London, basically. And allowing immigration into Canada, okay? The nature of the Canadian economy basically then form the nature, the structure of Canadian society. All right. Okay, so let me explain to you what the Canadian side society, the structure looks like, okay? So as I said, Canada is owned by the Crown, but we say crown, okay? We literally mean the King of England. But it's not really the King of England who's in charge. It's a city of London that's in charge. Why? Because historically it is the city of London which has lent money to the crown, and therefore the city of London can dictate the policies of Britain. Okay? So when we say the crown, we. We actually mean the city of London. Now, the city of London does not really care about every operations in Canada, so instead There are these CEOs that are responsible for the everyday management of Canada. And we call them the Lauration elite, okay? The Lauration Elite. And they're basically, you know, the prime ministers. The ministers, okay? And a lot of this is hereditary, okay? Justin Trudeau is part of the Lauration Elite. The people around him are part of the Lauration elite. And it is best to think of them as pseudo aristocrats, I would say pseudo aristocrats, okay? People who like to read Jane Austen, basically, men and lords. It's very easy to be part of the Lourdian league. You don't have to do anything because the economy just functions by itself, okay? You're at the crossroads of the British offshore financial center as well as the US Manufacturing power. And so the Lerging elite don't have to do anything, okay? And so they just live a life of leisure and aristocratic virtue, very much like Jane Austen, if you read her novels, okay? Their life is basically mirrored in the life in the novels of Jane Austen. And they aspire to that sort of life, a sort of pseudo British aristocracy, okay? So then around the original elite are the bureaucracy, okay? The federal. The basically the government that actually runs Canada, all right? And then. Around the bureaucracy are basically white Canadians, okay? Canadians who have been here for like more than two, three generations. And what keeps this system going, okay? Because quite honestly, these guys don't really do any work, is immigration, continuous immigration, okay? And this structure allows Canadian society to function. But once you have the structure that determines the very composition or nature of the Canadian culture, I would say there are three aspects to Canadian culture or the three most salient pillars of Canadian culture. The first, I would say, is following rules, okay? Because remember, Canada is a corporation. It's a bureaucracy. So what's really important is just follow rules. When you go to school, what are you taught? Follow damn rules, okay? All right? That's number One. Number two is be polite, okay? So you think that being polite is just means being nice. Actually, what being polite really, really means is respecting the social hierarchy, okay? Understanding your place in the social hierarchy and investing yourself in it. Which leads us to the third characteristic of Canadian society, which is mediocrity, okay? Mediocrity just means a lack of ambition. Again, in Canada, the worst insult you can fraud someone is, this guy's ambitious, okay? That's like saying this guy's a pedophile or something. All right? So these are the three main characteristics of Canadian society. Everyone has to follow rules. You have to be polite, and you have to be conventional. You have to be mediocre. Being ambitious is wrong. And if you are too ambitious, then you should do everyone a favor, move to United States, which is what I did and what Kathy did. So this is what has worked in Canada for the past seven years. And this is how this helps us explain why Canadians are so nice. Because the point in Canada is to maintain a status quo, because the status quo works for everyone. Okay, all right, so then the question then is, right, so this is fine, right? So why would the system break down? Why are we seeing massive immigration? Why are Canadians being mean? Why are. Why is Mark Carney being Prime Minister and starting a trade war with Trump? And the answer is, And you guys will know the answer if you've watched my lectures, but the answer is elite overproduction, okay? You've got too few pictures of power, and you've got too many, too much elite competing against each other. And to put this in very simple terms, what this means is right now, okay, is the City of London is not doing well economically, and so it needs to put more pressure on Canada in order to generate more profit and more revenue, okay? Before, the state of London was perfectly happy to get a certain return on investment. But as time passes, as the state of London faces pressure, financial pressure, it needs to exert more pressure on Canada, more revenue, okay? The problem with Canadians is they are too polite and they are too mediocre. So your company, okay, you're the investor. And you look at a company like, wait a minute here, the middle management, if they're not actually working that hard, what do you do? You replace them, okay? We call this a corporate restructuring. That is literally what's happening in Canada today. Right before your eyes. There's a restructuring going on where the. Where the old Canadian guard is being replaced by immigrants, okay? That's why they're doing this, to generate better return on investment in Canada. Canadians like the environment. Canadians, like, care about family. Canadians care about being polite. We don't want that crap, okay? We just want a higher return on investment. Go and destroy the environment. Abandon your families. Stop being so nice. Start making more money for us. This is why this is happening. And it's very clever what they're doing because Canadians can't respond because of the anti nationalism that has been indoctrinated in you in the education system. Okay? So specifically this idea that's been very popular, which is this land in Canada does not belong to anyone except the native people, right? On the plane from New York, from Boston to Toronto, I'm in Air Canada. And for whatever reason, Air Canada puts on an ad saying, thank you. This land is the original people. We are grateful. Why are they doing that? It's to diminish or reduce resistance to this corporate restructuring. If this land does not belong to Canadians, then it's probably fine to give it to the immigrants, right? In fact, you have these court cases in B.C. where they're trying to take private property and return it to the indigenous people. Okay? Right? So there's corporate restructuring going on and there's really nothing the Canadians do can do about it. Because the anti nationalism in this country. You can make the argument that antinationalism was part of the Canadian education system in order to make the restructuring fast and easy. But then you're like, okay, if there's restructuring going on, who's coming in? Okay? And if you're the British people, if you're the City of London, you're an investor historically, you recognize that there are two groups of people that offer you the best return on investment. All right? Okay. So what we're seeing in Canada is an invasion. It's not really an invasion, but it's a restructuring of alliance between Zionist capital and Hindu labor. Okay? This is why the vast majority of immigrants are Indians. And that's what. And. And there's Zionist capital that's supporting this movement. Okay? This is what the corporate, corporate restructuring looks like. All right? And then you ask yourself, wait, wait, wait a minute here. If it's clearly population replacement, why isn't the lower Asian elite opposing this? Or why are they even supporting this? And the answer is, because if you are the middle management, okay, you're just trying to keep your job, for God's sake, okay? You just want to keep your job. So if you're like, you know what, if I go with a stupid restructuring, then maybe I can continue being a man and lord and an aristocrat and like My children can continue to be so. But no, no, no, that's not how restructuring works, okay? The restructuring. In the restructuring, everyone goes, especially the old management, okay? And eventually, eventually, maybe not now, but eventually, the Lauration elite or certain factions, elite will recognize this, in which case, what is their play? What is their strategy? It's to join the United States, right? So this is over the next 10 years, 10, 20 years, the conflict in Canada where it's been. Whereas the Russian elite become much more clear about what's happening, that there's a restructuring going on and the city of London wants to replace everyone in order to make Canada more profitable for the state of London. There'll be certain factions of the original elite who are like, we're actually better off being with the Americans. Okay, so you think that what's happening is a trade war between Canada and the United States, between Mark Carney and Donald Trump? No. Okay? Mark Carney, his boss is not the Canadian people or he works the Sea of London. All right? And if you don't believe me, consider what's happening in Argentina, where Trump has come out and said that Argentina should reclaim the Falkland Islands. Why is he doing that? Have you seen the map? Argentina is in the middle of nowhere, man. It's far away. Who cares about these stupid islands? Trump is doing this in order to enforce the Monroe Doctrine or the Trump corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which is like the entire Western hemisphere is the United States. Guys, State of London, get out of here. All right, so the first major litmus test is what happens with the Falkland Islands. Because Argentina wants to reclaim the Falkland Islands. Trump will help, will help Argentina do so. And we will try to see Britain's response. Okay? How will the city of London respond to the second big limitless test? Is Alberta. Okay? If all my predictions, all my analysis is correct, what will happen is this. The people in Alberta will vote to secede from the Confederation. Okay? And then this will go to the Canadian Supreme Court. The Canadian Supreme Court will then tell the reality to everyone, which is, guys, you think is a democracy. You think the people are sovereign? No, that's not true. Okay? Actually, everything belongs to the Crown. Therefore, Alberta, you can't succeed, okay? This is retarded. Why do you think you have sovereignty? No one, like, like the crown owns all the land. You cannot succeed. Okay? And this is going to cost Trump to intervene and says, maybe I'll send a peacekeeping force to Alberta in order to make sure there's freedom, democracy in Alberta. Okay? So. So if my analysis is correct, There will be next two years, two major points of friction. The first is the Falkland Islands, and the second will be Alberta. Okay? And Alberta will be the major task, if my analysis is correct or not. I think, I think what will happen is that one, the people of Alberta will choose to become independent. They won't join the United States because they cannot, but they can choose to become independent. This referendum will pass, but then it will go to the Canadian Supreme Court who will rule for I don't know what reason they will say, but they will rule. This referendum is non constitutional. It is unconstitutional. A voter cannot succeed. This will draw Trump into the conflict. Okay, so that's what I think will happen long term. It is very hard for Canada to maintain its current way of life, okay? You either have this massive restructuring where Zionist capital and Hindu labor become the new elite, okay? Where it's basically population replacement. Okay? Like to put, to put it in very simple, stark terms, it is population replacement. Or you could have Canada divide up into different provinces. If Alberta goes, the western province will go as well. Then Quebec will go, then the Maritimes will go, and the only place left will be Ontario. Okay? Ontario will become Canada. So but the question then is, well, Ontario by itself, is it really a sustainable, self sufficient economy? And the answer is no, it's not. Okay? So I would say that is the stark choice Canada is facing. I will also say both will probably happen, okay? You will have population replacement and you will also have the provinces break up. And some, like Alberta, will choose to join the United States, some will become independent, and maybe on tour will be the last province standing in Canada. Okay? All right, so I know this was a lot to take in and, but are there any questions about this? Okay, so, so, so, so, so here, here's what we'll do. Okay? Maybe Tim can come and moderate, but we'll first discuss this general thesis, okay? And then after that we will open up to more general questions. Okay, but, but first let's focus our discussion on this topic because we're in Canada and this is most pertinent to your lives and your future. Okay? So Tim will moderate. Tim. Tim will pick the, will pick the speaker and then we'll have a discussion. Okay, So you just mentioned that there's a possibility of Canada splitting up at the end in the long term. But all the land belongs to the Crown. But then the Canadian people are not like, you know, they're gonna, they're not gonna revolt against the Crown, so there's no revolution. How are they able to split up if everything belongs to the Crown legally. Okay, so that's a really good question. And so what we need to appreciate is that Canada is a series of fictions, okay? And these fictions can be contradictory. So one fiction is the crown controls all Canada. It's a fiction because unless you have the military to enforce your claim, then it's just a fiction. Right. And that's what Trump is saying. Trump is saying. Well, technically, yes, the cruelty controls 89% of Canada, but we are in the United States and the Western hemisphere is ours because of the Monroe Doctrine. So, like, what's going to happen is if we roll our tanks into Toronto, is Britain going to send their 5,000 troops over to protect Toronto? Probably not. Okay, so the idea that The Crown controls 89% on Canada, it's just a fiction. All right? The idea that Canada is a democracy, that's also a fiction. So there are different fictions in place. And what Trump is doing, but not just Trump, but also Putin, what they're doing is just saying, well, let's test these fictions. Does that make sense? All right. Okay. Anybody have, like a related question before we view your topics? Yeah. Right. So again, guys, we're focusing on this topic, right? Thank you. Yes, Hello? Yes, can you hear me? Yes. So what if neither the Laurentians nor the Canadian people prefer to be the underdog of the US or the Crown? If they play their cards right, will they be successful in setting up their own ruling, their own oh system? Yeah, so that's a really good question because it is possible for Canada to triangulate because it's already at the nexus point between the city of London and United States. Okay? The problem in Canada and the reason why Canada is able to maintain the status quo for so long is blissful ignorance and self denial. Okay? So maybe because you guys are used to me and you're willing to put up with this, you're willing to hear this out, but I guarantee most Canadians do not want to hear any of this crap, okay? They actually. They would come in racist, they would say I'm stupid. But most of. But most would just too turn off. It'd be kind of dissonance. They would just not give anything and they walk out and they would forget everything. Okay? So Canada is in a state of self denial. And the problems in this country, no one talks about. I mean, no one ever talks about COVID and what happened with COVID No one ever talks about the fact that Mark Carney was able to be anointed as Prime Minister. It was not A real leadership race in the Liberals. No one talks about this stuff. Okay. So there's no strategy in this country. These people in charge, the racial elites, they're just basically like feudal manor lords who are interested in raising sheep. That's about it, yes. Yeah. So I'm curious if your hypothesis is correct, right. And Alberta is kind of amalgamated into the United States and slowly, kind of Canada fractures in the state that it's currently in. What do you think will happen to healthcare? Because I know healthcare is like a source of great pride in Canada. If Alberta becomes part of the states, they're all going to lose their health care, and independent provinces aren't going to be able to kind of provide the resources necessary. So can you kind of address that? Yeah, that's a great question. So if you're pursuing age, don't expect to have a pension, don't expect to have healthcare, and just getting by will be enough. So one thing that I don't think Canadians really appreciate is, is the idea of scarcity. And there are a lot of immigrants coming into this country, and they're tough people, meaning they have lived through the worst lives. They've lived through famine, they lived through violence, gang warfare, all that. So Canadians don't really know what's coming. But the Canadian economy is in deep, deep trouble, because as I mentioned, there's three pillars to the Canadian economy. There is the offshore financial center, the money laundering, immigration, and the resources. Well, because of the trade war, Canada's in, the Canadian economy is completely screwed. Okay? So Mark, I don't know why people think Mark Carney's a genius. Look, the United States is the buyer. Canada's a seller. You don't piss off your customer, okay? You don't do that. So Trump knows he has all the cards. And you will have a massive recession in Canada very, very soon. And there's no hope, because this is not a trade war, okay? This is a. This is a fundamental conflict between the United States and the City of London. The United States will win this war, and the United States will win this war by inflicting as much pain as possible on the heating economy, which will then provoke people in Alberta to vote for independence. And it will cause a lot of pain in Canada. So a lot of people will want United States to invade. Look, I was on Kurt Metzger's show, Ministry Boys. I was joking about this, how, you know, like, the United States should stop attacking Iran and started attacking Canada, okay? And their opinions in the comments section was like, we welcome this. Thank you very Much. Okay. Because they understand that what's really going on is population replacement, and maybe Trump can save them from what's going on. Okay. So I would say the next five to 10 years will be pretty bad. All right, let's go to the front over here. Hi. So since Canada is, as you're saying, is a corporation of UK UK Tried this immigration model and probably is now trying again with Canada bringing in more immigrants. So if we have to predict future patterns that would happen in Canada, should we look at UK what has happened in UK in past 10, 20 years? That is what exactly going to happen in Canada. Secondly, now, as you said, immigrants are being brought in to raise ambition. They bring in ambition. And the three countries that you gave example, like France, Germany and US Ambition was connected to us. Now, since ambition would raise here in Canada would rise here in Canada, is there a slightest possibility that Canada might actually become the next US And US Is declining as per your other theories? Yeah. Thank you. So these are two great questions. Okay, so let me summarize. The first question is, will Canada, the immigration here may kind of be like Britain. Now, we know the major problem in Britain is the Islamic vacation of Britain. There are a lot of Muslims in Britain. That's causing a lot of social conflict within the country. Okay, that's the first question. Second question is, well, in theory, if you have all these ambitious immigrants come into this country, then wouldn't Canada become like the United States and therefore maybe a dominant power? And so both are really interesting questions. Okay, so I want to spend some time here. Analysis. All right, so Britain and Canada are not the same place. Britain is a nation state. People in Britain have a heritage, they have a language, they have a culture that they're very proud of. And this Islamification of Britain is causing our social profit. Because of that, you have lots of people who are setting up. And quite honestly, I think Britain is very, very close to civil war. And in fact, I mean, it's almost at the ting point. What you need to appreciate is the city of London and Britain are not the same thing. The city of London is the center of transnational capital. All City of London is interested in is trying to create as much seat, much return on investment, the investors as possible. Britain is actually a nation state. So city London is a parasite on Britain. It's possible for the city of London to move anywhere around the world if they need to. Okay, so Canada and Britain are not the same thing. You want to have the resistance to immigration that you had in Britain. Okay. But now you Ask the question. Okay, but now you bring in Zionist capital and Hindu Labor. And so theoretically, wouldn't that make Canada in the future a superpower? Okay, there's something called the Century Project where by the end of the century they're hoping to have 100 million Canadians. And it's all part of like the idea that Canada can, because of its resources, because of its size, become a superpower as well. And the answer is no. Okay, so let me explain why. If you're the city of London, Canada for you is almost the ideal place to corporate restructure. Because of the people, the people will not resist you. Therefore you can find the ideal combination in order to restructure the society, in order to generate the most return on investment for you. Okay, so there is Zion's capital and higgy labor. All right, so first let me explain Hindu labor. It's easy to understand where India is one of the fastest growing populations in the world. That's a problem because you have too many young people in India and you let them sit in a country, eventually they will revolt. Okay? And this already happening in India, if you've been following the news, something called the top worlds revolution in India. Basically young people protesting against the corruption in the school system. Right. So your only solution long term is to export your people overseas. And I'm already seeing that to Canada. But you need to export even more to Canada. Now, Zionism controls capital. And what's really interesting between about Hindu labor and Zionist capital is actually a pretty good combination. Okay. Because Zionism, look, to put it in very simple terms, Zionism is about racial supremacy. All right? They don't say this, but if you actually look at what they do and you look at their belief system, it's about supremacy where, where the Zionists, the Jews are at the very top and everyone else is basically a servant, but you enjoy being a servant because they'll treat you well. Okay, Hinduism has a caste system. All right, so you can imagine a relationship where Zionism marries into a Brahmin class and then they're able to control Hindu labor. Right? Pretty simple. Pretty simple relationship. In fact, what's really interesting is that India is only was one of only four countries in the world where Israel has a net favorability rating. I was in Austin and an Indian American told me he went back to India and he was asking people where they were planning to immigrate. And a lot of them say, we're planning to immigrate to Israel. Okay, okay, so this is a, this is the combination that the state lender wants in not just Canada, but also Australia, Ukraine, Argentina, other places as well. Because for them it's a best return on investment. Okay. Because Indians and Jews are pretty hardworking and they're really talented, so it makes a lot of sense. But you're like, okay, what's the possibility of them making Canada superhuman? The answer is none. Okay, why? Because the Hindus and the Zionists are also practice their own racial supremacy. So Zionism is loyal to Israel and Hindu labor is loyal to India. Okay, so rather become a resource colony for Britain. What will happen in the future is that Canada becomes a resource colony for India and Israel. But it's the same thing. Okay? Canada is our resources to be extracted. Okay. But that this is only assuming the United States goes along this clan and the United States will not go along this clan. So the United States would rather kind of break up into different provinces and divine rural Canada. All right. Yeah, we're here and popped up first. Just. Okay, I'll come back to you. You're welcome. Yeah, yeah. Professor Jiang, I'm friend Joy. I asked you a question yesterday on the zoom. Okay. Fundamentally, I kind of see where you're going with the thesis, but I fit fit into your archetype. So I'm Hindu Brahmin from India, and I'll tell you why I think I can push back on this thesis. So first of all, I know you say Hindu labor, but I think my friend can hear correct me as well. Most of the Indians that come here actually seek from Punjab, and almost none of them are very minority are Brahmins, which are the upper caste that come to Canada. So I don't know if you're aware of the immigration application system to Canada, but there's an application system where you have points. So I studied in the us I went to CMU for my undergrad and I. I was at Northeastern for my grad school and I was a senior AI engineer at Amazon. I applied to the immigration system of Canada for eight years. I was on the wait list and I had the minimal points because I was not married. So I didn't have kids. I didn't speak French, so I did the English language test and I got like a perfect school because I'm from the uk. I grew up there. So those still didn't give me any points, but. And I had a lot of friends from my sort of circles of the similar profile. None of them got into the Canadian system. But the people that actually got into the system were a lot of people from India, though from the lower costs Not Hindus, didn't have an education. And most of them, when they come here, they do odd jobs, they do like, they drive trucks, they do like grocery stores and they, everything. So. And I wanted to come here as a senior AI engineer and I was like very ambitious. I ended up getting my green card in the US first. So I kind of pushed back on the ambition because I don't think Canada is looking to attract the, the top tier talent, which maybe Israel would like. So I'm not sure what the overall thesis. I do fundamentally agree with the Indian labor theory, but. And the, the cockroach party and all of the stuff. But I don't understand why I would not be allowed into the system. Whereas people much less qualified, like get here with all the perks and also puts pressure on their housing system and stuff because they're bringing families and their extended relatives and so on. So I don't know your thoughts on this. Okay, yeah, thanks. I really appreciate the point. Okay, so let me explain how I think, right? I am not saying there are people in a board rule discussing how to do this. Nor am I saying that premium policies are developed in order to promote this. I use AIM theory, okay, which is say, like given the structure of the world and given people's incentives, how are they most likely to be aid in the future? Okay, so these are predictions. I'm not saying that there are people in charge who want this to happen. I'm not saying that they are planning to replace a population. I don't think anyone is like that. But I'm just saying that given the current state of the world, given the particular structure of Canada, what is most likely like to happen next 10, 20 years? Okay, so as you point out, there are millions of Indian students in Canada right now that do not have legal permanent resident status. They have no path to citizenship. Okay? And they're here just doing odd jobs. They're here as students. But then you ask yourself, okay, how can Canada make them go home? And the answer is you cannot. Okay, if tomorrow Hawkeye says we are going to make every Canadian go home, you can't do it. They will apply for refugee status. They'll part of the court system and they will continue just being here. All right? So I'm not saying this is what they want to happen. I'm saying this is what's going to happen over the next 10, 20 years because of the particular pressure and friction within the Canadian economy. Does that make sense? Okay. All right, So I have pretty much a scientific mind. I have done my PhD as a Fulbright Scholar, I went to Harvard, to MIT to specialize in AI and I studied system dynamics. Coming out of MIT, trying to understand where the world is going. And what I found out is that the Bible is very much informing us about what's coming. In the book of Revelation, everything is aligning in that direction. And we can read there that it says nation will rise against nation. Those are the birth pains, the beginning of the pain. So I love that you talk about the different layers of the narrative, but I think if we can go a level deeper into the narrative and what's coming, would you agree that what we need to do is to build cells of resilience? Yes. All these noise things are happening, but shouldn't we put our focus and attention into building cells of resilience that would have the resources and the sense of support system and the community support to withstand what's coming? Yeah, no, I can agree. So I think like one of one of the things that have made people weak is a heavy focus on individualism. Right. And if we're to survive what's coming, then there has to be a commitment to other people. So I think as human beings, there are two things we do, two things that make us truly human, which allow us to live the best possible life. The first thing is to make promises. Making promises means building community. Okay. We clums to come together and work together. But the other thing is to is also forgiveness, to forgive other people's mistakes. And so any community should be based on these two basic principles. And if they do these two basic principles, then the community really becomes resilient, is able to survive heavy calamity that goes off. Okay. All right, thank you. All right. Okay guys, let's stick to Canada and then we'll open up later. Okay? Okay. Professor, just a quick question because the analysis that you made seems like whatever the effects or consequences going to happen in Canada, it's all based on the friction between the United States and the Britain. Do you think that it is all because we have Trump here in the United States and if the Trump would not be there? Because I know one of the predictions yet you have that Trump could come for the third term. But the past trends that we saw that having Mamdani in one of the area and in the Minnesota, there is apac versus non apac people are coming up and rising up. So do you still think that Trump would come and go for the third term? And if Trump would not be there, will that consequence of what you said about the Canada will remain the same? Or not. Great question. Okay. All right. So the United States, for the longest time was an empire that governed by consent, okay? The United States was very popular around the world, and people believe that it should be the hegemon. But over time, because of severe mismanagement, you have a $40 trillion debt, you have these wars overseas, you have inequality, Corruption in Washington, D.C. america's global setting has gone weighed out, okay? But just because you're not popular anymore doesn't mean you surrender the empire. It just means you're now forced to have an empire by force, okay? Now, before, you had empire by consent. Now you are an empire by force, okay? The problem is a transition because most people don't want to be assholes, okay? Joe Biden, Kamala Harris. Yeah, the politicians, and they're very ambitious, but they don't be perceived as assholes. They care about the legacy, okay? There's only one person in the US Political system that's a willing, rich asshole and is proud of being as Donald Trump, okay? So this, I think, helps us understand why he's in power. Because remember, in 2020, the entire elite, the entire American elite coalesced against Trump. $6 billion was spent on defeating this guy in 2020 and bringing Joe Biden to power. What happens then? What happens afterwards? Horden comes and invades Ukraine and embarrasses the American empire, and Biden was too weak to resist Putin. Okay? So in 2024, the empire was basically, we need some, like, 12 to be the scapegoat, okay? The scapegoat just means, like, we know the empire is collapsing, so, like, let's get someone to be the scapegoat. So everyone blames this guy. We also want to maintain our empire that needs to be an asshole to Canada, to Europe, to Japan. And so we need someone who's willing to do all this. And that person is Donald Trump. Right? And not only that, but this transition might take some time. And so if you can't finish in the second term, we can't trust Democrats to come in and follow through on a lot of his policies. So we might have to give him a third term. Also. What's really just about Trump is he's unique in American politics, and that is able to capture the entire tension consciousness of the global public. It's really strange back to 2003. United States invades Iraq, and there are huge programs around the world saying there's a war for oil, okay? No one's like, george W. Bush is a moron. They're all like, no, it's all for oil. Fast forward to today. Donald Trump invades Iran. No one's like, this works for oil. Everyone's like, this guy's a moron. That's really strange. Okay, but if you're a part of the elite, if you're being an empire, this is really useful. Okay? Who else can you get to do all this evil crap? And they get all the blame for it. Yeah. So I think Donald Trump will get a third term because for the empire, he is indispensable. Okay. All right. Somebody over here. So while Downing street is fighting the White House, presumably with the awesome south down street, is the city of London. The city of London. Yeah. It's not the same thing. Okay, my apologies. Well, the Commonwealth, like the city of London, is fighting the White House with their lessons in India and their caste system. What is France doing? Because they have Quebec here, and so they presumably have a bit of a say in the Northwest Passage. Is the Elysium coming to save us? Are we going to have a revolution here? From the yellow jacket French. The French don't see Quebec as part of France, but could they when it starts going, no, no. If you send a French person Quebec, I'm pretty sure you'd be like, we don't want this problem. Okay, no, no, no, Quebec guy. No, no, que France does not want anything of Quebec. Sorry. Next. Sorry. All right, this is in theory, even if in practice it's futile, which is the implication that I'm getting from you. But just in theory, how would Canada become more of a nation state? Oh, in theory, how can it be? Can become a nation state? Well, Canada needs to stand out and fight. Okay. So in theory, this trade war could be an opportunity for Canada to become a nation state, where the Americans are putting a lot of pressure on Canada and Mark Harding rallies the Canadian people to say, we will, as a people, fear this pain, fear the suffering, and we will become independent. Okay, if you were to do that, then that would help Canada become more of an issue state. But Mark Carney does not care about Canada. He does not work for Kennedy. He works for the City of London. Okay, so for him, as a banker, it's like, how do I make the best deal to my investors? Okay, so in other words, Mark Carney at a very critical point, will eventually sell Canada. Yeah. Professor Zhang, thank you for what you do. Right, so just an observation now, do you, considering how you've set up the power structure in Canada, do you think that explains their reaction of the elite towards the trucker convoy back in 2022. Yeah, no, that. That's a really. That's a really good point. The. Yeah. So Justin Trudeau was his scapegoat, Right? It was Mark Carney that was actually running things. And what Canada did to the Trump printers, I think was really unfair. Not to the truckers, but I think if you. You gave a dollar to the. To the truckers, you got debanked. So. Yeah, so. So I think you're right. That's the trucker. The COVID response. It is. You could, in theory, predict it from. From the structure of main site. Yeah. I think in the Globe and Mail or someone in the papers, Carney made a comment about why they should be debunked. And I can't believe that people forgot that he actually expressed an opinion of why they should be debunked. Yeah. So it's really interesting how Canadians vote and how they think, okay? Because most gay voters, and when. I mean most gay voters, I'm actually talking about the baby boomers and the white class of voters. They understand the system subconsciously. And so their mentality, the gate theory response is, if I play along this system, then I can maintain my privileges, okay? Because they think that if they're white, they can have these privileges, and they don't appreciate that it's population replacement. Okay? So the way that Canadians vote is not indicative of democracy, okay. If it's a true democracy, then the voters would not be afraid to overturn the government. And Canadian voters are very unique. I mean, I don't understand why people voted for Mark Carney. And the idea that, oh, Mark Carney was set up against Trump. That's retarded. Okay? So I think that the voters are conscious of the system. They play a law in order to maintain the privileges. Okay. All right. Yep. Hello. Welcome, Professor Jiang. Thank you, Kathy, for putting all this together. I'm one of the Hindu laborers that's taking over this country. I'm sorry, guys. Okay, so everything that you've described here, the kind of the structure of how Canada is controlled by the crown, just on a ground level as people with all the natural resources that we have in this country, the fresh water, the fertilizers, all that kind of stuff, isn't it an advantage for us to be in Canada? And also, you've seen Trump, what he's saying with Lake America. Maybe he's interested in the freshwater of Canada. He's trying to kind of set that all up. I'm just wondering, could you speak more about the fertilizer situation and how that's going to play. And also maybe if you can go into Mark Carney, how he kind of got conservatives to cross the line. Right. So I hope you can get into all that. Thank you again. Right, okay, so that's a great point in that Canada is, objectively speaking, the richest country in the world. Okay. Canada has like almost unlimited freshwater resources, energy, land and very low population. So in theory, Canada is the richest country in the world. And you would think that Canada has a very bright future. But historically, wealth and resources does not necessarily lead to the best outcome for a nation. Okay. This is often referred to as a resource trap in that you have too much wealth, it leads to corruption, it leads to inequality, it leads to complacency in society. Okay? So we, we see this all the time in Africa, places like Nigeria, which is extremely wealthy with resources, but it's always been corrupt. Canada is not as corrupt. Canada is one of the least corrupt countries in the world. But people here are complacent. People here are not going to work very hard. One thing that we need to factor in is the mood and the energy of the people. Where in theory, if Canadians got together, work really hard with its resources, Canada can have a great future. But often in times of imperial decline, you have exhaustion, you have people who are just lazy and want to do as little work as possible in order to get by. Okay. And that's why this replacement is happening, right? Because if people are like, you know what, things are not as good as they used to be, so let's work harder because we're the warfare expense in the world and we send together, we'll, you know, be better off, right? Instead, the outfit seems to be like, ah, whatever, okay? In which case this is forcing the restructuring of Canada. This is forcing the population replacement because again, the state of London wants return on investment. Okay. All right. Hi, thank you for sharing your ideas. What would you recommend for someone who's thinking about having a family here? This is creepy. Okay, so we have kids and a couple of years ago, I think I'm actually returning to Canada and living here. And given what I've seen these past two years, I came to Canada with my two kids last summer. And I will say that on the surface, Toronto looks like a great place to raise a family. It's quiet, it's prosperous, it's peaceful, it's safe. But I'm not, I'm not optimistic about Toronto, Canada's long term prospects. And I think that Canada is on decline. So one question that you need to ask yourself is Can I buy a house? And the answer in Canada is often, no, I can't buy a house or I will suffer if I buy a house. So my honest advice is to look for a place where you can afford a house. Because often a place where you can afford a house is often a place in which they're family friendly, they're growing, they welcome families because they want to grow the population and they want to grow the economy. A place like that is Austin, Texas. So I'm not sure you're ever going to Texas, Dallas, Houston, Austin, but you can still buy a very large house, a four bedroom for maybe half a million at a 30 year fixed year fixed rate mortgage. That's really good. Okay. I think like they have that in order to entice young people to go. So ask yourself, you know, not where you rather be, but ask yourself where I will be welcome. And that's actually more important, where they value my contribution, where I can be part of a growing community. And Toronto is definitely not welcoming. I came 33 years ago to Canada and I can say that we, as a Canadians, because I consider myself Canadian, basically lost the passion for Canada. On the other hand, Americans, because I worked over there for many years, have a passion for United States. Now United States, divided as it is, in my opinion, can survive either to having the dictatorship that looks like UFO or it will have a civil war. Can you comment a little bit about it? Because that's the only way through the history that empire, or better say, remnants of empire will survive. Yeah. So it's interesting because United States, it is in imperial decline. And when empire decline, it causes also havoc to itself as well as the world. When empire decline tends to be over aggressive and it overextends itself and engages in wars or conquests throughout the world. That's why it wants Canada, that's why it wants Cuba, that's why it invaded Venezuela. But also the empire decline tends to rupture internally. That's why it's very likely in the next 10 years there will be a civil war of some sorts in the United States. And the civil war will be a long term thing where the states are in defiance for the federal government. Okay, so maybe Trump has a third term in response. New York, California, Massachusetts, these very liberal Democratic states, they are openly defying Trump. And this could lead to conflicts between federal law enforcement, ICE basically, and local law enforcement. And I think this will be a very long term thing. So it's a very strange thing where within the United States there's some conflict and the civil conflict is externalized by going and conquering other places. So the civil war in the United States, the Americans are much more likely to come invade Canada in order to resolve their eternal disputes. Okay, if that turmoil in Canada doesn't have a chance in your op, Canada military. I mean, like, how do you resist the US Military? It kind of doesn't have a military. Guys. I'm sorry. I mean, like. Yeah, all right. Yeah. I wanted to understand more about the Zionist capital side. So I understand, like the Hindu labor, but does the Zionist capital look like buying up of Tim Hortons and all of those corporations? And what exactly makes a Zionist? Is it because it's going back to funding, like, the war in Israel and the Greater Israel Project? Yeah, I mean, Zionist capital often just means Jewish capital. Okay. So there are Jewish Diaspora around the world. And, um, a lot of them have access to a lot of wealth. And they're able to, because of the religion, because of the community, they're able to coordinate the application of this wealth. Right. They're able to invest together. All right, so Jewish. There are Jewish bankers who have had access to gold for a long, long time, like the Rothschilds. And over time, your investments just grow and grow. And Zionism just means that you care about Israel and your investment. How you choose to apply your capital, you are doing in a way that benefits Israel. Okay. Does that make sense? Okay, thank you. Yeah. Professor Zhang, you play a lot of poker, as you know. So how would you approach Carney going to China? We know that he's already had this canola deal for electric vehicles. Was that any kind of a red line, maybe for our relationship with the U.S. given that we are this resource colony for a waning empire in the City of London. Are there other larger, namely China, would they be interested in our resources? Thank you. Yeah, that's a great question. Okay, so again, Mark Carney does not work the Canadian people. He works for the City of London. And the City of London sees Canada as a resource colony. So what do you do if you're not doing well? Well, you strip your assets, right? You sell your assets off to the highest bidder. And that's why Carney visited China and wants to sign all these deals with Chinese. That's why Mark Carney visited the Middle east as well. Okay. Qatar, Saudi Arabia. Okay, so they're trying to sell assets to the rest of the world. Right, because they're trying to generate as much return on investment as possible for their investors. Is that going to work? Because what people don't appreciate Is that global trade, global finance? It's predicated on the United States being able to guarantee world peace, right? And so you're, you're China, and you're like, you know, like, if I put in $200 indicating real estate, how can I make sure this is safe for me, okay? Because again, remember, before it was United States which guaranteed that people could trade peacefully. But now the United States is going into decline. The United States is very aggressive, especially towards China, Chinese. And I be certain that they put this investment into Canada. They will be able to maintain it. Okay? So basically another way of saying this, and it's hard for us to appreciate, is all the traditional paradigms that we grew up with are collapsing right before us, okay? All these fictions that we believed in are collapsing before us. If you have $5 million on the bank, okay, you think that, oh, this money is mine and I can at any point take it out. Don't go try it. You can't do it. Okay? You go to the bank, you're like, I want. I want I $500 Canadian in my bank. I want to take it out. They're like, sorry, we can't do that. You're like, how much can I take out? Maybe 10,000. Try it. Try going to the bank and try to get all your money. It's a fiction, okay? That money, you think it's yours? It's not yours. It's just a number they made up. Okay? So all these fictions that we believed in are collapsing right before our eyes. Okay? Yes. Hi, just a quick question. Can you just explain in simple terms, how does the increase in productivity generate an increase in return on investment for transnational capital? And then the second question is, let's say your population replacement theory is correct. And let's say in a couple of generations, Canada gets hollowed out and middle management is replaced. How does that change the status quo of the picture that you laid out for us? Thank you. Sorry, sorry, can you repeat the same question? It's like you're saying, basically the problem is that Canadians are too complacent, right? If, let's say this population replacement theory happens and we get replaced with hard working, productive, potentially ambitious people, how does it change the complacency of Canada within the whole, like, Israel kind of higher. Okay, all right. Okay, all right. Okay. So I'm gonna answer your question in, like, very simple terms. Okay? All right, so imagine this city of London is a landlord, say, of London landlord. Okay? I've lived. So then what I want is people come and like, grow crops on it, right? And then I take a share of the. Of these crops. It's only if they use the land. Is my land valuable? You're just sitting there. It's worthless, okay? So the peasants come and they grow food on the land, okay? And the more food they grow, the greater cut I take, right? Because I get 10% of everything. So I want them to grow as much food as possible. Problem, though, is, okay, over time, these peasants are really hard working and they step up a lot of grain, okay? They have a grain, a granary. And then the children are like, well, I could go work for the landlord and go crops, but my parents have a granary, so why don't I just like, you know, not work, okay? And that's the same kind of today. So if you're the lander, you're like, screw this, man. This system sucks. So what I do well, what I do is I burn down the granary, okay? And I bring in new peasants who have no grain. And so they force to work really hard, right? That's what's happening in Canada today, right? So not only will you have population replacement, corporate structuring, but you should also, you will also See Next About 10 years, a financial collapse, all right, because that the burn down the greenery in order to make the country much more productive. Okay? So your parents, these baby boomers who think they have like a million dollars in the stock market, $2 million in housing, and so they're good. No, no, no, wait five years, okay? I guarantee you there's going to be a great financial collapse in order to reset the economy, okay? The great reset. All right. Okay. Yes, hello, Professor. With sticking to Canada and all of the new builds that are being introduced, like Bill C8, 2232 and all the freedoms that we're currently, that we currently have to say what we want to say online and, you know, in public discourse, and you're seeing the expansion of that Wharton window in the, in the recent past. How is that going to change with these bills being introduced? What can we do about it and how can we safeguard ourselves? That's. Yeah, okay, so that's a great question. As you probably understand or appreciate, a lot of these bills are being passed in order to disguise the transition, right? So they are trying to restructure the economy, replace the population. And so they're trying to step up criticism in order to make this process as smooth as possible. And that's why they are passing these laws. So what can you as a person do? You can't protest. They'll come and arrest you. And maybe you don't want to flee the country because you love this country. And so my best advice is to. I keep on saying this, but it's very important to start focusing on spirituality, on community, and on family. Okay? And so if you just shift your focus from one of material acquisition to one of enjoying the time of your family, then you'll be much more resilient. Okay. All right. Okay. Oh, will AI and robotics have an impact of your idea with the draft? Sorry? AI and robotics. Will that have an impact on your idea? Like within. With warfare? Will that have an impact with your idea of the draft? Or. Okay, so the draft. Yes. To facilitate this process, what Carney's gonna do is introduce a draft and force Canadians to go fight this stupid war in Ukraine. Robotics and AI are overhyped. The reason why is both are very dependent on the global supply chain network. Okay? So if you work in AI, if you work in robotics, you know that you are dependent on critical minerals and elements that you import from all around the world. In a time of war, these global supply chains break down, and so you're not able to advance AI and robotics. Okay. And really? Look, look, I know there's a lot of hype around AI and robotics, but the people in charge don't think in those terms. They just think about how to control the population and how to better exploit the population. Okay. All right, who's next? Over here. Stand up. All right, well, please mention that you believe that Canadians who have their investments lying in Canada might not be too good in the near future. And I'm wondering if you think that people who have land in Canada or people that are landowners with significant pieces of land here should feel secure, or if they should be looking at other options for places to be, or if, like, their land may not be so secure in the coming future. With all the things you were discussing today about how Canada might turn out. Yeah, that's a really good question. So let's just imagine a scenario in which United States comes and invades. And would they respect property rights? And I think they would respect property rights because if they're. If they come and invade, they would want to basically get the population on their side. The best way to do that is by respecting property rights. Okay. Remember, their enemy is not the people. Their enemy is the same London. Okay. Again, 89% of Canada is Crown land. So the other 11. Do. Do the Americans really care? Not real. Okay. Right. Yep. Hi, Professor Jung. My question is, why does The US Empire need. Why is it necessary for them to take over the Canada which is owned by the city of London? Isn't the city of London an American empire powered by the same transnational capital? Yeah. Okay. It's elite overproduction. Okay. Elite overproduction, meaning you have too many young ambitious people for what power? Okay. So, like, if you just let them sit in the country, they'll just cause a revolution. So the way you resolve this issue is like, guys, go to Alberta or go to. Go to, like, you know, British Columbia and take. Take over that place. Go to Venezuela, guys. Okay, so. So Empire extension is about trying to relieve the domestic pressure. Okay, so is Trump in a different national capital? Oh, I mean, is a U. S. Empire different from the city of London in. Because, you know, US Is trying to take over Canada. Yeah, yeah. They're different groups. Okay. Except London right now controls Canada in a percent. The United States is like, well, are we going to steal it? So let's go steal it. Okay. So, I mean, they're all thieves, but there are different groups of thieves. Fight many poor carefully. Yeah. Oh, yeah, got it. So just got a quick question on the state or the future of Canada. So you basically said that essentially Canada will be sort of Balkanized, right? So Alberta might be on its own, Ontario also, and maybe Quebec might be independent. But there's some other theories that are floating around there. Which is one, I think Kevin o' Leary talked about the potential for Canada to join the United States, but under an economic union very much like the European Union. There's also obviously the theory that Trump keeps talking about, which is becoming the 51st state. But there was also a question that was posed to Carney about potentially joining the European Union as a way of sort of combating what's going on with the United States. And then Carney obviously had that famous speech regarding middle powers, which then also kind of leads to the theory that there might be some sort of, you know, tie up there in the future with the Europeans to combat what's happening with the United States. So just curious to see if you think those alternate realities are possible versus the Balkanization. Yeah. Okay, so there are two possibilities, right? The first is that Canada becomes a 51st, 51st day. Second possibility is that Canada joins the EU basically alliance of middle powers that Mark Carney talked about in his World Economic Forum speech. Okay, so my question is, why does United States want Canada? Right? Because we take all Canada. You're stuck with a health care system. You're stuck. You're stuck With a pension, you're still stuck with a lot of government burdens, okay? You're still struggle with a bureaucracy. Got the United States. I'm like, why do I want to absorb this crap? I. I want Alberta because Alberta has the energy, right? It has the car sands. That makes sense. But why do I want Ontario? Why do I want Saskatchewan? What good do these places do me, right? I'm better off just taking Alberta and then letting the rest of the country burn down. Because once you lose Alberta, you lose the main source of revenue for the country. You lose government subsidies, the healthcare system goes bankrupt, the pension system goes bankrupt. You have rights on the street. And then the Canadians beg you to come and save them. But then I can choose where to go, right? So that makes absolutely no sense for me to take over all Canada. I mean, I'm better off just in Canada and taking parts that I want right now. Then you're like, okay, well then what if Canada joins the eu? Do you know how incredibly incompetent the EU is? Like, have you seen this war in Ukraine? It's a disaster. It's like, trust the guys. I mean, like, the European leaders are even more idiotic than Mark Carney. Like the British leaders, you have Macron, you have Mercel. They're just the most unprofit people that ever existed. What good would it do Canada to join the eu? Also, like, you know, far Europe is from Canada. Okay, we can drive the United States. Europe is at least seven hours away by flight. Okay? The Atlantic Ocean is pretty big. Makes absolutely no sense for Canada to join the eu. And again, look, Canada is a resource economy. It sells resources. The United States is a manufacturing power. It wants resources. Europe is a dying museum. It doesn't need the resources. Okay? So, I mean, it's completely unrealistic. Yeah, go ahead. I just moved from Chicago to Toronto, so I experienced a bunch of privatization of military and the police. And Chicago was in conflict with ice, so people were terrorized. I completely understand that. My question is the military industrial complex is trying to expand the empire and make the technet, and they're trying to drive out transnational capital. Their biggest agent is Donald Trump, who is getting old, has had assassination attempts and is losing, you know, confidence. People are losing confidence in him, but doesn't matter. He'll take back power with force. What happens if the military industrial complex loses this agent? What happens to their. Would someone else come and continue driving the defense strategy that they've outlined? That they've outlined to go all the way to The Technet. Yeah. So look, if you look at the swap administration, they pretty much go align on the vision. Okay. You got people like Katie Vance, Marco Rubio, Peter Hegseth, they're all aligned with this vision of the greater North. Mariba. It's a pretty broad consensus of people. So it doesn't matter if Trump is still in power. Next guy will follow through. Okay. But it'll probably be a much slower process and it'll probably be a much more chaotic process. Right. What's making this process so smooth is the fact that everyone's attention is focused on Trump. But if you remove Trump, then people will be much more able to analyze the structural forces at work. Okay. Hi, Professor Jiang. I have you quoted saying two different things. I have you saying Canada is better off working with the US US and then also that the US Is a declining country. So how do we square that? Thank you. Yeah, that's a really good question. So when I say the United States is declining, you have to appreciate that the decline just means that you go from a global hegemon to a regional hegemon. Right. I mean, like, it's pretty incredible. The United States was able to control the entire world hold for the past 30, 40 years, and now it needs to retreat from the world and focus on the Western hemisphere. But I mean, like, within the Western Hemisphere, there's no power that challenges of the United States. Okay. All right. Yeah, yeah. I wanted to ask when you said about Zionist capital, bringing Hindu labor into Canada and the U.S. not letting that happen, I don't understand why they wouldn't let that happen, especially when Trump has acted not in the interest of the US With Iran and other stuff. And why breaking down Canada would conflict with bringing Hindu labor. I just don't see how those ideas conflict. I said the United States was a. Gets the restructure. The United States is not against restructuring. It's. It's a question of like, who owns the land, like, who controls Canada. Right. So the restructuring is going to happen regardless if the United States is in power or the State of London in power because. Because they both are looking for the best return on investment. So I never really said United States is against restructuring. Okay. They're for this. Okay. All right. Can you double down on the City of London bit? Like, there's, it's not an, is it an economic, like, where is the flow of funds or the economical tie that sits there for like that return on investment? Because it's not like, like, it's not like we pay. There's Like a very nominal amount, like yearly, that's actually paid out to the UK or the Commonwealth, so to speak. So, like, where is that actual economic bit that sits? Like, how does the City of London actually benefit year to year or decade to decade? Okay, all right, so that's a really good question. Okay? And. We need to appreciate the city of London. It's like Wall street, right? It's an umbrella term, okay? Within the city of London, there are these corporations, these banks, companies, okay? They have assets in Canada, okay? So they control mines, they control forestry, they control water rights, okay? And so as a corporation, you make money when the nation is productive. When we mean productive, we just mean they're energetic, they work really hard, okay? And these companies are global. They're everywhere. They're in Australia, they're in South America, the United States. Companies like Rio Tinto. Right? Rio Tinto, a major mining conglomerate. What I'm saying is the entire Western world is declined, okay? Why? Because the people are not as part of working as they used to be. They're very complacent. And so for you, if the company's not doing well, what do you do? Well, you restructure the management in order to make the workers work harder. Okay? So another way of saying this is okay, In Canada, the average Canadian is like, you know what? I'm good with making enough to get by. I'm more focused on my family. I want to enjoy my weekends and my cottage. I want my two vacations a year, okay? That's a Canadian attitude. Whereas maybe if you are Indian, okay? And you are poor, you come here and you're like, you know what? I need to bust my ass in order to stay in this country. So the Canadian has more money, but the Indian will do more, will be more energetic. He'll do more labor. And as a capitalist, I extract value from the energy and not the capital. Okay, all right. Yes. High profile. Two questions, a macro and a micro. The macro one, if you're Laurentian elite, like, you know, applying game theory, you see yourself being replaced. Doesn't it make strategic sense that you cut yourself a deal with the U.S. and sell your country to the U.S. like, I mean, I'm sure they know that the U.S. can take over Canada. And, like, you know, you'll be out of a job anyway. So why don't you sell Canada to the U.S. be and manage to, like, you know, hold on to power still, like, you know, agree to manage Canada. So I hate to emphasize this point, okay? But when I do my analysis, the people in charge think I'm a complete moron, okay? Because you're like, this is not what we actually do, man. And so what I was going to say is these sort of structural forces are invisible to people, all right? And one reason why my predictions have been so accurate is I look at these social forces as the main determinant of history. Okay? So the people in charge don't really think in these terms. They don't really think that there's a population replacement going on, there's a restructuring going on. They're just trying to do the best job they can and return in and have the biggest R R I return investment where they can. What I'm saying is that over time they will behave like this. Okay? So number one is a lot of these things are this full to people. Number two is it is easier to practice self denial. And you're seeing things clearly, okay? Because obviously if you are in charge of the liberation elite, you see things so clearly that can only lead to dismay. And these people don't want to feel bad about themselves, okay? So these things happen and no one can stop them because the people in charge practice self denial. They are delusional. They live in their own bubble which reinforces their own prejudices. All right? Yes. Oh. So the top level question is, what do you think are the odds that Carney will not kind of sell out to City of London or kind of people who are associated with him on that side, but more so he does perform more for the Canadian people in light of these upcoming economic challenges being potentially addressable In a similar way that in history, in the 19 kind of 20s and 30s, we saw FDR do kind of like a New deal with infrastructure programs similar to how we got what, 10 billion into the railway system, into Canada, another like 10 billion electrification program into the east, another like 10 billion for the icebreaker fleet. And of course we've heard about the submarine fleet. So these domestic programs where billions are being poured into those and their corresponding supply chains. As an FDR like New Deal response that could help that. You know, this does seem to be kind of in lines with trying to help stimulate and protect the economy from that. And of course the trade deals internationally as well. Okay, that's a really interesting question. And what you do recognize is that Mark Carney is not fdr. FDR was an American aristocrat very much like John F. Kennedy. They were both very strong willed, very independent. Mark Carney is first and foremost a creature of finance. He first started his career at Goldman Sachs, then he went to the bank of Canada, and then he went to bank of England. And given his resume, there's no way he is independent. There's just no way. You do not climb into that position of power, the bank of England, the bank of Canada, the Governor, unless you're completely controlled and you're controlled above both, okay? There's just absolutely no way someone with an independent streak would be allowed into that, that position. And you can argue, well, you know, maybe he'll have a change of heart, right? And the reality is there's nothing about this character that suggests that he cares about anything except his own status, about his own power. Look, guys, look at the picture of Mark Carney. The guy's like. The guy's like a classic Hollywood villain, okay? There's a cross between Emperor Palpatine and Voldemort, okay? Who faces not lie. He is pure evil. He is pure opportunism. If you have like, just look at his face, man. Okay? I mean, like Mark Hardy would have never, ever got elected in the United States, okay? Wherever you have democracy, there's no way the people would have put a guy like that in power, okay? Yeah. So you're talking about these forces that a lot of people can't see, and you're talking about the divisions and the West. But isn't there a deeper force that is actually driving unification? Do you believe that we will get to the point of a one world order with digital technology that's actually controlling us more and trying to put even more, well, controlling us in the end, if that's the case, if you believe that's coming, isn't that where we should be putting our focus? What are the implications for all of us, rather than us? Because I think these are all. It's very important analysis, but I find that it's distracting us from the real threat. Okay, that's a really interesting point. Okay, so it is true that there are a lot of people who suspect that the real purpose is to go to what is world government. What is world government? Okay, that is true. So why is it that everyone believes that we're moving towards a one world government? And I think a lot of it is just intuition about how the elite operate and how the elite think, okay? If you go to a world Economic Forum, you hear our carnivore speeches, if you see how these people talk, they are at the back of minds thinking, if it's a one world government, okay? But what's really important for us to understand is why would they think in those terms? Why? Why do they want a one world government? And the. And the answer is, and this answer is going to surprise you guys, okay? But what I believe is that as you climb in the power hierarchy, okay, as you become more and more powerful, as you absorb more and more wealth, you become a billionaire or trillionaire, the way that your mind operates changes, okay? So for example, using an average person, you see the world in terms of other human beings, okay? But at that level, you are removed from humanity. We see humans as more thoughts on a screen or life on a blueprint, okay? You start seeing things from a human lens. You see, start seeing things from a systems or structural. You basically see the world as a blueprint, okay? And so your mind, what happens is your mind becomes focused on creating a wine wall government because this is easier for you to manage society and there's only a small group of people anyway. But there's a problem or weakness to this style of thinking, which is as your power increases, your imagination decreases, okay? So there's this inverse relationship between power and imagination. The more your power increases, the more your imagination decreases, which means that you develop hubris. You are not capable of understanding your own limitations. You are capable of appreciating. You could fail, okay? In which case you can't actually succeed. So it's a very strange dynamic where never before in human history have so few people accumulate so much wealth and power from themselves. But because it done so, it creates hubris, and the hubris will ultimately lead to their downfall. Okay? So another way of thinking, figuring of this is maybe thinking of this as the power battle, okay? So the one world government is their version of the power of baptism. We know how, the sort of how Babel turned out, okay. Yeah. So I'm just trying to have a little bit more clarity in my mind. Let's. Let's imagine what you say in terms of Canada happens. The country breaks up. And I think you spoke to it when you were in Austin that Trump would give it to his friends and powerful people and such, you know, if the US US Were to absorb it. I'm just trying to understand because you tend to ground a lot of your examples with historical precedent or at least stories and mythologies. That's the one that I haven't really been able to understand because, for example, this one, my mind immediately went to Vietnam. As far as the hubris of the US they had all the power, but they weren't able to defeat the Vietnamese and they were defeated themselves. What would it look like in your estimation if the US Is able To absorb Canada and what does life look like on the ground in that reality? That's my question. Okay, let me ask you now, if US Tanks will roll into the streets of Toronto and declare Toronto to be angrily Canada by the United States, how would you feel? I mean, not great. Not great. Just like, oh, what's going on? Just shock kind of thing. Shock. But then eventually get used to it, probably. Yeah, you get used to it. Yeah. Right. To be honest with you, the vast majority of responsibility spot maybe in the beginning, like the Americans are, and then the next thing, like, oh, whatever. Okay. Like, how do I get to work? Kind of thing. Yeah. Okay. So, so, so this is what I've been saying. Canada has anti nationalism, okay? So it's almost impossible for Canadians to, To, to resist because there's no mythology underpinning this resistance. The Vietnamese were able to resist because they had like 2000 years of resistance against imperialism. They resisted the Chinese, they resisted the Mongols, they resist the French. Okay? The Vietnamese are very proud and very brave people. And people don't appreciate that about the Viennese. But when you go and you kill one Viennese, the entire family will take up arms and fight you. The number of people that the Americans killed in Vietnam were just, Were just tremendous. Okay. The Americans tried almost everything except nuclear bombs against Vietnam, and Vietnam refused to surrender. The Guines aren't like this. Okay, okay, next, I have a question. It's not related to Canada, but one of the driving forces that you've talked about, which is the rise of Israel in India, and the fact that the people that drive change the most are usually the most extreme or the most eschatological. So there's an eschatology in Hinduism which is we're in the Kali Yug and where this is the age of darkness, where even though we don't see the physical manifestation of demons and angels, every human is basically fighting this war within themselves. So it's, it's the demon demonic powers versus the, the good. The good, the angels trying to fight over what we do and our actions. And so we truly don't define like Trump or Carney, like you said, is the epitome of evil. If this fight. And also I think Jewish eschatologies, like there's a war of Gog and Magog, eventually good will prevail. So is that what you see as well in this one world government? Like, essentially the people in charge will have good forces or good thoughts to change or lose their evil sort of plans. Okay, so the Kali Yuga, I Think we're definitely in the Kara Yoga Yuga because it lies with a lot of other eschatologies because I look at this Lindsay Kranzi case. Have you guys been following this Lindsey Kranzi case? And I mean, it's shocking to me, not only because she was able to do this, but also, like, there's so much division about what happened. Okay. There are literally millions of women who believe that she is completely innocent. And the husband, Patrick was the one responsible for killing the three kids. I'm like, what kind of society, what kind of age are we in when it's so obvious what happened? And then, you know, it's unbelievable that this was able to happen and then society is not able to come to a clear moral understanding or verdict. So I think we are definitely in the Kali Yuga. I'm not making a judgment about what happened. Okay. And there was a mistrial. And there was a mistrial. Okay. But I'm just saying, like, these actions and the fact that there's so much conflict in the Vision Society, it is definitely indicative of the Kali Yuga. But I think that what these escalators say is we will not enter a stage of a new world government or stability. It's just like complete another civilization collapse. That's what we're really facing. So the elite, I mean, indeed, we're able to construct a new system that I think everyone will benefit. I think what's going to happen is just the gradual collapse of everything that we would call civilization, the breakdown of global trade, the violence around the place. It won't be very pretty. Okay. Yep, yep. All right. I have a spirituality related question similar to the last one. In a previous lecture, you said something like, the future will be not a battle between organized religion and atheism or materialism, but between organized religion and free spirituality. And with emerging ideas like growing popularity of Hermeticism, Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, and at the same time, potential theocratic state in the U.S. how does that world develop if there's a theocratic state that's more traditionally Christian, that's being enforced. Yeah. Okay, so I did mention this, but this is a more long term prediction. Okay. Like maybe the next 30 years, what are we saying today is the next five to 10 years? But the idea, ultimately you have more theocracies around the world. I think it's a very long term thing. And when these theocracies emerge, what we know is there will be a lot of resistance to organized religion. Because as human beings, we first and foremost strive for connection to the monad which we first want an intimate because actually God, but organized Galicia doesn't want that because it is subversive. Okay. But that is something that took me out in the long term. Yeah, yeah. My question's more towards the first nations in Canada. I know they're small and pretty unorganized, but back in 2016 they signed the China First Nations Pact with the western provinces and territories for resources like mining, water and forestry. If China. I know you touched on China. If China doesn't have enough energy to go through with that pact, who would you see the first nations kind of align with? I know they have only about 2 to 3% of Canadian land, but would they go with the United States or would China try and re energize to get those resources since they're going to be quite restricted over the next 10 years? Yeah. Okay. So something to be clear about. Okay. When we say China and practice is not really China, it's companies that are Chinese. And why this is important is you have, you have to ask yourself why these Chinese companies are coming to Canada. You think that it is about resource exportation, but really a lot of these companies are coming in order to launder money into Canada. And a lot of these trade agreements are way too long that remember, because Canada is first and foremost of off sworn financial center and there's a lot of money that's going to leave China and come into Canada. Okay, that's part 1.2. And this is, and this actually more important is China is about to go to war of Japan and this will change everything. Okay. Because what Japan can do is build an alliance to embargo China which will force China to retreat, basically repatriate a lot of capital and a lot of resources from overseas. So on September 15th, you know, 10 days from now, what's going to happen is China will restrict or close its border, basically. Okay, so China would basically turtle up. So a lot of actions you're seeing from China of an outward expansion, it will not be sustainable. Japan will put too much pressure on China. So. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Related point on the US and Canada trade war, do you like basically what you talked about with China aligning with potentially Canada, do you see Canada potentially like, you know, do more trade with Canada or aligning, partnering more with China? Yeah, Certainly Mark Carney wants to align more with China. Right. So again, Mark Carney represents the interest of the City of London. Let's see if London sees Trump as a threat. So what Carney is trying to do is Build an alliance to counter the United States. That's why he's reaching out to the Middle east, to China and to Europe. But if you're China, you're like, I'm better off actually working in the United States. Okay? Because the real power are the Americas. And quite honestly, if I'm China, I need to export my goods to the world and I need to do it in a very stable relationship. So I'm better off working with the United States because I have real power. Whereas the Canadians, the Europeans, the Middle Easterns, like, who cares? Okay? So I know that Marc Curry does want to reach out to China, but China doesn't care. China wants to build a strong relationship with the United States. And at the end of this month, President Xi will visit Trump in Washington. It'll be a huge thing. Okay? There'll be a state visit, a state dinner. There'll be a lot of problem circumstance. But not only that, there are two more visits scheduled for the rest of this year, one in APEC, another in the D20. So altogether this year, there are four bilateral meetings between Trump and Xi. State leaders do not meet unless they are about to reach a major agreement. Okay. You don't need to fight the need in order to sign documents. Yes. Hey, professor, thank you so much for what you do. I have a question on looking at the geopolitics through the lens of what's happening with the oil market. So, for example, Canada exports a lot of oil to the United States, but recently, because of the conflict, they're looking to diversify, so creating the Western pipeline and potentially exporting to China. I was curious about your view of how this will develop over time. And also, like, if we look at it, China imports oil from Canada, but also recently, because of the Iran war, they decrease their imports significantly, probably because of the pressures from the US side. So this complex way of how US China and Iran are managing the oil market. I was curious about your thoughts. Secondary question is kind of more tied to what China is doing specifically is China has a relationship with Iran and China doesn't want Iran to fall. So when China reduced the import, it actually reduced the oil price a lot, which kind of counters what Iran is doing with the straight up Hormuz. So I was curious about your thoughts of how they will navigate going forward. That's the second question I have. Yeah, thank you. Okay. All right. So I hate to say this, okay. But one thing that we need to appreciate is global leaders, their mentality has changed a lot. Okay. So maybe before, like 20, 30 years, ago you had global leaders who thought long term, nationally and strategically, okay, Long term is basically like, you know, I'm going to fake the next 10 to 20 year, 30 year time frame, all right? Nationally, this means, like I'm going to put my natural interest before my own personal interest. And then strategically just means I'm going to consider the reactions of other parties, okay? And today none of these three things apply. So right now they think in terms of very short term results. Okay, Short term, then it's personal and it's like basically just pathically. Okay, Pathically. All right, so basically it's always a question like, how do I benefit as soon as possible from what I do? So let me give you an example. A couple years ago, there's a really famous case in China. And what happened was this business guy, this businessman, has a falling out with his business partner. So he, he hired a hitman to go kill his partner, okay? He gives a million dollars. I'm just making the summer up, okay? He gives a million dollars to hitman, says, go kill this guy. Before, 20 years ago, the hitman would just go and kill that guy, okay? And then the business is done. Today what that hitman did was like, well, I could go and pull the trigger and kill that guy, but you know what, what's my best short term, personal tactical interest? Okay, I'm going to go and give half a million dollars to another guy to kill the bird, to kill the business partner, all right? Then the second thing, man, is like, well, I could go and kill the guy, but let me hire someone else to do it. So he subcontracts to the third guy who gets $250,000. And then the guy's like, well, I'll subcontract again and again. He gives the fourth guy $100,000, 100,000 US and the fourth guy was like, well, I think they'll kill the BIS partner, but I can make more money by running out the the guy, okay? So he gets, he goes to a business partner and says, hey, I was giving you $100,000 to kill you. You give me $200,000, I'll go and help you. The business partner, like sue you are. I'm going to report you to the police. They're all arrested, okay? This is how the world works today. The leaders in charge trump Carney. They're all like this, okay? So you think that Carney wants to create the western pipeline, a 20 year project? No, he doesn't. He doesn't care. He's using it as a negotiating tactic to get the most leverage against Trump. Okay. Whenever you have a leaders, say, 20 years from now or, you know, like, let's do this big project, it's all an illusion. Okay. None of them actually think in these terms. All right. Yeah. So I'm curious, when you were talking in your lecture previously, you blamed the trade war on Carney. Well, I definitely want to say I in no means support Carney, but don't you think that Trump started it? And he started it because of the deficit, but that deficit is driven by their imports of Canadian crude, which they then refine and sell at a much higher premium. You know, back to Canada. You know, as I said, I don't support Carney, but I got to give credit where credit is due. He is standing against. Against the tariffs. Right. And related to that, another question, when you're talking about, you know, the reason Poliev lost is because he refused to. To blame Carney for being, you know, just in the, in the pocket of, of London. Right. Don't you think? He didn't. He didn't challenge Carney in that, in that way because he himself is in the pocket of, you know, transnational kind of Zionist capital. Right. But Poliev is actually leans more on the side of Trump. So he wasn't able to challenge Trump in the way that Carney did, which was obviously performative, but nonetheless. Okay, okay, So I don't. I understand that it's Carney's fault this trade war started. Okay? I didn't say that. What I said was Carney's response is stupid or ineffectual. Right? Because, like, United States is the biggest trade partner of Canada, the biggest customer of Canadian resources. So what I do believe is Trump did start this war. And the point starting this war is to force circumstances in a way that allow that. That would create the partition of Canada. Okay? So Trump, remember before this war started, he said. He said that he wants to make Canada into the 51st state, right? So this is a part of the process of turning Canada into the 51st state. But again, he doesn't want Canada as a 51 first date. He wants Alberta. All right. Okay. Okay. So, guys, I'm pretty tired, so we'll do final questions and then we'll call it. Okay. All right. Yes. So my question is on freedom of speech and what the people can do. So if you look at our issues, right, the city of London is basically controlled by the elite. Even Trump is actually working with the Zionists. So at the end of the day, the world is Controlled by the elite. It's up to our people, we the people, to revolt against that. But then some of us now, we can't even share a news article on Facebook and we are restricted during COVID Our channel gets shut down. So how do you see what the people can do? And how are we going to be restricted to speak up and can you comment on that? Yeah. Okay, so I think it is incorrect to say the people versus the elite. I think, like, what drives the world is conflict amongst the elite. Okay, so different factions of the elite are fighting amongst each other and is our place to get involved because we don't have the power and will probably be used as pawns in the great game anyway. But it is in our power to focus on spirituality, to focus on our families, focus on our communities. Okay, so I do know that, yes, it is true that I am very doom and gloom in my Jupiter analysis. Okay. But what I also do is I also teach the beauty of the great books. I also teach the beauty of spirituality, and I talk about the importance of having a family and focusing on children. And, you know, so a lot of what I do is for my kids. I want my kids to learn about the world and have more control over their own destiny because eventually I will pass on the scene and my kids will inherit the future. And that is what keeps me safe. So, you know, when I went to the United States, I did a lot of podcasts. I met a lot of famous people, but my focus was on taking my son around and showing him. So I think if you just focus on what you can't control, that will just make you insane. You have to focus on the things you can control and, you know, learning by yourself, learning as much as you can, being nice to people around you, educating the people around you, that's something that you can't control. Okay. All right. Thank you for coming to Ron on enlightening some. Professor Jiang. Two quick question number one. For many Canadians who grew up in Canada, we really embraced multiculturalism and respecting different cultures, learning from another. But for the recent years with like, an influx of immigrants and like, they also brought us a lot of things, you know, like, guess I don't want to use the word the bad side of cultures, but like, cause a lot of, I guess, conflicts between, like, Canadians and immigrants, how do we refine this compassion to accept, like, the immigrants that come to our country and be able to, you know, embrace multiculturalism again? And the second question is, if, let's say PP Polyvery won, do you think he would Also be like an agent of the England, like the city of London, or do you think he will act differently? Thank you. Okay, well, let me ask you the second question first. Okay? There's no way Pierre Oliver was going to win. He's been set up to be the loser always. Okay? And the one reason why we know is Abbott lost against Bacardi. He still stayed. He still stayed in power. That doesn't happen if you're in politics. If you're the opposite leader and you lose election, then you're supposed to resign. He didn't resign. In fact, he lost his seat. And what he did was he took someone else's seat. Like, what's going on. Right? So it tells us all this is being states managed and he's being set up as an opposition leader, not the prime minister. He's too incompetent to be prime minister and he makes a very good opposition leader. Okay. He rallies the anger of Canadian people. That's his role. Okay. And he's very happy being this actor. Your first question about multiculturalism, I mean, look, the population is being replaced. People are aimed. There's no solution to this, okay? People know them being replaced, right. To be nice to our neighbor communities. And so there's a lot of possibility between is, can you use a bit of your. Yeah, all cultures. And so in. So I think a lot of this anger is being driven by such powerlessness, okay? Meaning, like Canadians are not even allowed to articulate this frustration. They're just not. You're not allowed to say, you know, like, these immigrants are. Don't know the rules and that you. Because they're racist, okay? So there are lots of systems built to ensure no prison could arise. And so this has led to a lot of anger, okay? So I think that if there are opportunities for constructive dialogue, then I think things will be a lot better. But as Canadians, you're not allowed to discuss these things. There should be town hall meetings where Canadians are permitted to discuss their concerns. Okay? But the gallant doesn't care anymore. All right. Yes. Are you aware of any consistent picture of the future that has been formulated and offered to the public after doom and gloom happens, except basically what Schwab offered as a dystopian world that we supposed to live in? That's number one. And number two, from your perspective, how many generations will be wasted in that gloom and doom picture that basically everybody is accepting will happen? So what was the first question? Are you aware of any, let's say, picture of the world, picture of the future that is Offered to the public that majority of humanity can accept as founding, let's say, point to go into brighter future after the gloom and doom. Schwab offered what he offered, basically, which is dystopian picture that I think normal men will not agree with. Now, do we have anything else consistently opened and offered to all of us that we can discuss and participate in contributing and so on and so forth? Because in my opinion, that's the most important part. Now the whole world is in disarray and nobody offers the future that we can gather around. Schwab offered it, but we know what is that. Okay, so there is a consensus amongst the elite, okay? The consensus is this. There are just way too many people on this planet, all right? If you really go to the east and you really are able to find private, everyone will grieve. There's just way too many people on this planet. It's leading to a lot of problems. So we went from 8 billion people to 500 million people. The world will be a better place. Okay? Let's not discuss how we do this, all right? But if we were to do this, then we could create a utopia. There'll be enough resources for everyone and people would get along a lot better, right? Imagine how much space there would be, how much resource there'd be if we only had 500 people. So how do we make. How do we go from 8 billion people to 500 million people? Well, I think God will take care of this, okay? But what might be important is if we make this happen as fast as possible. Because if we were to accelerate the process, we would reduce human suffering. Okay? So the options aren't, you know, like, how do we maintain peace and prosperity? Because we can't do that. The options are, do we want to accelerate the process and make it into a 20 year process, or do we just not do anything and have the process be 200 years? Because empires, when they decline, tend to about 200 years. Okay? Wouldn't it be better if we did it in 20 years or maybe in 10 years? That's how they're thinking. Yeah, but PK to the schwa, is there any alternative that you are fair, consistently present to the world? Well, I mean, there are these techno utopians like Elon Musk who tell us we'll go to Mars and everything will be solved. Okay? Or robots will take care of everything, but they're lying to everyone. Okay? That's not what they really think. What they really think is we need to reduce the population 500 million people as soon as Possible. That's how they really think. All right, we have three more questions. Okay. How many generations? I ask another question. In your opinion they want to do as soon as possible because I would reduce you in support. Okay, so it could be 10 years. I have a question. It doesn't have to do with Canada, so if there's a better time to ask it, I'm happy to pass it on to the next person. Okay, we're finished. Okay, so just one more question. So in Paradise Lost, Milton, he, like, interprets the story of Adam and Eve as the serpent being Lucifer. And it's my understanding. Let me know if I'm wrong. But before this interpretation, that was not, like, commonly understood, right? He kind of started that. Oh, he didn't. Yeah, I mean, this was commonly understood. Oh, okay. Okay, then that's good. Professor Jiang San. Professor Jiang, thank you so much for sharing all the information with us. And when reading your content or listening to the content. Your content. You make my soul sober by heart pain. It's really hopeless, it seems. But my question for you today is, do you have any comments on the Nepal Chinese border disaster? Any comment on that? Right. So I've not been following the news about the China Nepal border thing, but the reality is that over the next few years, these things will become much more common just because of how nature works. Okay. So I think that natural disasters will be a very common thing and it's something that we'll have to get used to. All right, if you have not yet asked a question. Okay. If you ask a question, please not raise your hand. Good to be with you here. Yeah. Sir, I just wanted to know, big fan. And when will be your series on the occult and Kabbalah? Will be coming? Really looking forward to it. Yeah. Okay. So right now I went on a tour of the United States and what I want to do now is just focus on the reading and the study of the occult and the Kabbalah. I have a general idea of what I want to talk about, but I'll call you another month of operation, okay? All right. Yeah. Yes, hi, I'm a big fan. I just wanted to know. This week, President Xi looks like he purged about 13 military and government officials. What does that mean for Taiwan, Japan and specifically Canada? Because sometimes I do think, feel that there is a lot of, you know, infiltration with the CCP in Canada, as is there is the irgc. So just wondering if you could. I know it's a multifaceted question, but. Yeah, that's a good question. And reporting on what's happening in China is completely wrong. Okay, so reporting is this is one guy in power, his political purge everyone, including his own friends, which is reported. Okay, so he's purged his enemies and now he's purging his friends because he's an paranoid dictator like Stalin. That's not what's happening. What's happening is this. China is much too large of a country for one person to be in control of. And there are maybe different factions that are competing against each other, fighting against each other. And one major consequence of this internal struggle is they're all trying to balance each other out. Okay, so maybe before, President Xi had too much power, so the different factions align against him. And so what you do is you don't attack the top guy, okay? Because that's too obvious and it would lead to disaster. What you do is you attack his lieutenants, because once his lieutenants are removed from power, he himself has absolutely no power whatsoever. All right, so what's been happening this past year in China is this constant global purge where different factions are removing each other's enemies, completion of power, and so they're basically neutering each other in order to create a balance of power in China. Does that make sense? In which case, what I'm saying is no one now is in charge of China. President Xi could be seen as the leader, but all he's doing is implementing a consensus they agree on. And one consensus they agree on is we need international stability and we need to work the United States. Why? Because Japan is coming. Okay, so they agree on basic things, but like right now, there's really no want to met. And that's why China has been so passive these past few years. Given though, a lot of things are happening that go against Chinese national interests, especially this war in Iran. Okay, so the reporting around China is completely wrong. No one's in charge right now. The guy sits at the figurehead. There are different political factions and they're all trying to balance each other out. Okay, yes. No, I just wanted to ask how can we prepare for what's coming, Essentially, especially the younger generation, like Gen Z, beyond of what you've already mentioned, like, get together, have a family, love each other, build a community. Do you believe in God? I do. But I wanted to say on an individual level, what can one person do to prepare? I would strengthen my relationship with God. So whatever you need to do in order to strengthen your relationship with God is important. So that could mean going to church, that could mean reading a Bible, that could mean Doing a lot of career. That could be. That could mean engaging in your own spiritual practice, like for general meditations. Okay. All right. You want to pick the last one? Yeah. Okay. All right. So, so, so. So we'll. We'll do some more, but only if you have not yet asked a question. Okay. All right. So. So we'll make sure everyone has a chance to ask. Ask something. Yes, let's look in theory. So. Thank you. If Trump has been very open about a third term and potentially invade Canada or at least take over one province for the city of London, from their perspective, wouldn't it make sense for them to invest ahead of time? Let's say a strong collation against Trump with military support, and they could potentially trigger American civil war in advance so that their interest in Canada is protected. Okay, so again, the City of London is an umbrella term for transnational capital interests. Okay. And it's. Transnational capital interests are divided amongst different groups. So I'm not saying it's 12 versus transnational capital. It's one group of transnational capitalists behind Trump versus another group of transnational capitalists under Mark Carney. Okay. That's a real conflict. All right. Okay. Next. Hi. With regards to Alberta and the potential for a US Trying to take claim of it, do you think it's more likely that they will send in their own military ground troops as a way to take claim of it or through the use of funding separatist groups that align with U.S. interests? Yeah, that's a great question. Okay, so if you look at U.S. military doctrine, their main strategy is to use special forces and embed them into local insurgents. Okay. That's the way they do things. So there's no way they're going to send it on a ground invasion because it's too costly. It'd be unpopular. What they'll most likely do is insert special forces, CIA agents and organize local insurgents. Okay, great. Go to the War for bear. Yeah. Next. Hi, Professor Zhang. So I know you're doing the the Next series on the occult, and I know you're no longer at the high school that you were before. So I was wondering, what setting are you going to be doing this class in because you no longer have your students to interact with. Yeah, okay. That's a really good question. Okay, so right now I am considering different possibilities. I am. I'm considering a lot of possibilities right now. But, like, right now, I'm just focused on the content and then the location. The students is something that I'll think about later on. All right. Yes. Hello, Professor. You were saying that your advice to the younger generation, Gen C, is to get closer to God. So I wanted to understand the relationship between God, the Bible, the Nomad. Basically that. Okay, so when I say get closer to God, I mean you have to give up your materialistic understanding of the universe. Okay, so in the materialistic understanding, when you die, you lose, you just die. Okay? You become nothing. And that creates tremendous angst and dread in people. But if you believe in the Monad, you believe that there's a source, you believe that there's structure to the universe, then what you believe is that you're just here for a purpose and that when you die, you come back eventually. Okay? So death is only a new beginning. So you have to believe this. Once you believe this, then everything else can fall into place. But once you accept that there is a God and that God is the source from which you come, you come here for a purpose, then for you, what's important is to first of all discover your purpose and then rebuild your connection with God which will lead you to your purpose. Okay, Thank you, John. I watched many of your videos and I feel a lot when you mentioned you came from a poor family and trying to establish a life here in Canada. So you tried and went to Yale College and you mentioned a lot of times you were a product of meritocracy. And I feel that because I could say I'm an immigrant here in Canada and I worked really hard until I find you mentioned about trying to connect with Nomad. And the more we work, the more money that we earn, we're farther, we go farther and distance from Nomad. And then watching your other videos like Immigration Trap and the Rat Utopia, I tried to connect the dots and I've seen a transition. When you mentioned you met your wife and you have your kids, that's when you felt comfortable with your life. But right now I'm not married. I'm a single young working force male and I believe a lot of people are like me. And before I get married or like a young man get married, what would be the right income number for us to be comfortable? And then we stop continuing to earning more money because we also want to connect with Nomad. Right? And money, it's an extract from our energy and time. Thank you so much. Yeah, I think that's a wrong way to perceive things like how much money do I need to make? You have to ask yourself, what makes me a happy person? Because once you become a happy person, you exude a positive energy and Then that attracts people to you. You have more friends. You have more dating options. So for you, it's really a question of, like, you know, what can bring happiness to my life? And then once you have this happiness, then this will bring happiness to others. And I think one thing that I've learned that's really helpful is the ability to tell jokes, the ability to make people laugh because, like, to tell jokes, you have to, like, be honest with who you are, and you have to let go of your pride, and you have to hug the interest of others before yourself. So I think learning to tell jokes will be much more effective than making a lot of money. Right? Okay. Yeah. So I've heard you mention the use of psychedelics to explore spiritual connections. And this is something that I've been doing probably for the past four years now. And I'm curious what you think about how they could be used to strengthen that connection in ways that I may not have thought of. Yeah, that's a good question. Okay. So psychedelics does open new channels, okay. It removes these material constraints and allows you to see a deeper reality. But you're not here to use psychedelics, okay? Psychoanalysis is a fool. You're here to love. You're here to learn. We're here to create. So your real purpose is to start a family. Your real purpose is to help others. Your real purpose is to suffer tragedy and trauma so that you can develop enlightenment. And psychedelics is a tool. Is that the purpose? Okay. All right, last question here. Yeah, this is very last question for you guys. All right. Hi, Professor. I just. I came from Kyrgyzstan, where the recent SEO meeting was held. I just wanted to know your perspective on the Central Asia, like, region or like Kyrgyzstan in particular. Yeah, a couple predictions. Okay, so the sco, Shanghai Cooperative Organization, this is meant to be an alternative to the current financial system, which is Pans Americana. And the idea behind the SCO is the US Empire is in decline, and it is trying to coerce the world to follow its will. So let's come together and let's work together cooperatively to trade with each other and bring peace to the world. Okay? That's. The theory doesn't work in practice because there are lots of internal disagreements amongst the members. Okay, so, for example, Putin was very angry because there were lots of people during the SCO who were trying to get him to stop the war in Ukraine. And he's like, what? I didn't start this war. Okay? So the scoff. It's not feasible. You need a strong leader to control this organization. It could be China. But China doesn't want to do that because it would mean military commitments in places it doesn't want to be committed. It would also mean the liberalization of its currency, which would cause a lot of financial problems within China.